[KiN | SuicideDog]

Originally Posted by CheesyPeteza It looks like high quality coding to me.

My code or his? If mine, are you telling me the logic looks good? Can you follow what I'm doing with it? (it's a little different cuz I have to adapt it so it works with my dead chat).. if I get it working I'll make one that works even if you don't have dead chat.. the logic when switching it off and on will be a little different.

[CheesyPeteza]

Originally Posted by KiN | SuicideDog Originally Posted by CheesyPeteza It looks like high quality coding to me. My code or his? If mine, are you telling me the logic looks good? Can you follow what I'm doing with it? (it's a little different cuz I have to adapt it so it works with my dead chat).. if I get it working I'll make one that works even if you don't have dead chat.. the logic when switching it off and on will be a little different.

The logic looks fine and I understand it perfectly. When I read it I think, that is exactly how I would have done it. 90% of the plugins I read from the plugins forum I think, wtf is he doing that for?

[KiN | SuicideDog]

thanks for the compliment on the code. I know there's always a million ways to do the same thing .. and always ways to make it tighter.. I use the KISS method.. but at the same time try to keep the code tight. Going back and looking at it, I can see 2 places right off the bat where I can make it tighter.. but I have to look at it and ask myself .. is it worth my time and adding complexity to it worth it. Will it really make it that much better? I can see it for huge programs.. but I don't see any performance increase will what I had in mind.. so eh, I don't do it.