[Kemsan]

My version of VS Saxton Hale I will publish soon, on 27 July.
Saxtoner team: http://img638.**************/img638/724/vshwest0010.jpg

It's rewriten VS Saxton Hale mode, but have only 20-30% code of old plugin.

[Drixevel]

Ya...if there are like 3 other plugins that come out or at least 2 other plugins, i'm probably gonna stick with eggmans.

[napalm00]

Originally Posted by r3dw3r3w0lf Ya...if there are like 3 other plugins that come out or at least 2 other plugins, i'm probably gonna stick with eggmans.

same here
also @kemsan, are you REALLY sure you want to give a saxxy to that spy?
and and, the pyro looks messed up =/

[asherkin]

Originally Posted by Velture Velture said that people should contact me on steam for more info since velture can't share it publicly now becouse .sp is not included for now. Also velture said that it WILL BE public when 1000000% bugs-free and it is called SAXTONER MODE (made by Kemsan) and there will be a new thread on forum with whole package (including source files). Velture also said that 4 servers are beta-testing it now. Add velture to friends.

If you are distributing it to anyone without the source code you are in breach of the SourceMod license, and you forfeit your right to use SourceMod.

[Kemsan]

asherkin we have separate page for the plugin where you can find source, compiled plugin and models and other things We don't breach license.

[Sazpaimon]

Originally Posted by Kemsan asherkin we have separate page for the plugin where you can find source, compiled plugin and models and other things We don't breach license.

Is this page already public, so anyone that uses your plugin can download the source, RIGHT NOW? Becuase if not, you are indeed in breach of the Sourcemod license.

[napalm00]

Originally Posted by Sazpaimon Is this page already public, so anyone that uses your plugin can download the source, RIGHT NOW? Becuase if not, you are indeed in breach of the Sourcemod license.

doesn't the GPL say "you have to provide the source code to the people you give your work to" ?
i don't think he's forced to give out the source to the public until he releases it, correct me if i'm wrong

[Cookies.net]

Originally Posted by napalm00 doesn't the GPL say "you have to provide the source code to the people you give your work to" ? i don't think he's forced to give out the source to the public until he releases it, correct me if i'm wrong

If they're giving their Saxtoner mode to people without access to the source code, it's a breach of the GPL. Which it sounds like they have done, not sure though.

[Kemsan]

Eh, testers have access to source code, he have access to this special page - I can give copy of plugin with source to testers yap? If I don't want to share now with others, and I want to test plugin, I can share only with testers? YAP

[Powerlord]

Originally Posted by napalm00 doesn't the GPL say "you have to provide the source code to the people you give your work to" ?

Yes it does.

Originally Posted by napalm00 i don't think he's forced to give out the source to the public until he releases it, correct me if i'm wrong

GPLv3 doesn't mean you have to share the code with everyone. It does, however, require that you offer the code to anyone you give the binary to.

Why did I bring up the GPLv3? Because that's what SourceMod is licensed under.