Raised This Month: $12 Target: $400
 3% 

[ANY] Little Anti-Cheat


Post New Thread Reply   
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
finishlast
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: In Reno with the vitamin
Old 07-10-2021 , 10:41   Re: [ANY] Little Anti-Cheat
Reply With Quote #401

The server is 100 tick And it did kick the macro user as expected.

But after round change we had two zoeys on the opposite team.

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Tanzanite View Post
What is the tickrate on your server?
Lilac will only enable macro detection if your server has a tickrate of 60 or more...
And L4D1 has a default tickrate of 30 ( https://developer.valvesoftware.com/...pport_Tickrate )
__________________
finishlast is offline
J_Tanzanite
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Norway
Old 07-10-2021 , 10:47   Re: [ANY] Little Anti-Cheat
Reply With Quote #402

Quote:
Originally Posted by finishlast View Post
The server is 100 tick And it did kick the macro user as expected.

But after round change we had two zoeys on the opposite team.
Yeah, I don't see how Lilac could cause the two Zoeys.


That said, I specifically wrote this in Lilac:
Code:
	// Ignore low tickrates.
	macro_max = (tick_rate >= 60 && tick_rate <= MACRO_LOG_LENGTH) ? 20 : 0;
So that the Macro check wouldn't run in low tickrate games like L4D1&2...
I thought L4D1&2 were forced to be at 30 tps, didn't think it was possible to increase it...

Plus, according to VALVe on the site I linked:
Quote:
The following servers tickrate cannot be altered as changing this causes server timing issues.

I doubt this is what's causing it, but be warned that Macro detection in L4D1&2 is not officially supported by me.
If it does work, that's great! But use at own risk there.
J_Tanzanite is offline
finishlast
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: In Reno with the vitamin
Old 07-10-2021 , 12:27   Re: [ANY] Little Anti-Cheat
Reply With Quote #403

The tickrate can be altered with an extension called tickrate_enabler.

Think there is a fix for timing issues like door close boomer range etc. called tickrate_fixer

The lilac macro detection on l4d1 works really good.

I keep an eye on it, if I ever again see a double bot. mb I can track that down.

Thanks for your work.
__________________
finishlast is offline
Fastkill91
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Old 07-11-2021 , 07:23   Re: [ANY] Little Anti-Cheat
Reply With Quote #404

Help me please, I can’t compile the latest version for vip core RIKO, namely for bhop, added include compiled but still bans the vip player for bhop!

Vip core Riko
https://hlmod.ru/resources/vip-core.245/

[VIP] BunnyHop
https://hlmod.ru/resources/vip-bunnyhop.925/
Attached Files
File Type: sp Get Plugin or Get Source (VIP_BHOP_1.0.2.sp - 45 views - 949 Bytes)
File Type: inc vip_core.inc (25.2 KB, 37 views)
Fastkill91 is offline
J_Tanzanite
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Norway
Old 07-11-2021 , 10:42   Re: [ANY] Little Anti-Cheat
Reply With Quote #405

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastkill91 View Post
Help me please, I can’t compile the latest version for vip core RIKO, namely for bhop, added include compiled but still bans the vip player for bhop!

Vip core Riko
https://hlmod.ru/resources/vip-core.245/

[VIP] BunnyHop
https://hlmod.ru/resources/vip-bunnyhop.925/

I don't know anything about VIP core, sorry.
If you don't want to ban players who you've given Bhop, then add something like this to your bhop code:
https://github.com/J-Tanzanite/Littl...ment-614134149
J_Tanzanite is offline
J_Tanzanite
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Norway
Old 07-15-2021 , 13:23   Re: [ANY] Little Anti-Cheat
Reply With Quote #406

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastkill91 View Post
Help me please, I can’t compile the latest version for vip core RIKO, namely for bhop, added include compiled but still bans the vip player for bhop!

Vip core Riko
https://hlmod.ru/resources/vip-core.245/

[VIP] BunnyHop
https://hlmod.ru/resources/vip-bunnyhop.925/
I was thinking about your comment for a while, until it hit me that I might have forgotten to add two lines after the Bhop refactoring...
And after taking a look, yup... I forgot to add two lines which prevents bans when you have a Bhop plugin.

I will add a fix in version 1.7.1
J_Tanzanite is offline
Fastkill91
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Old 07-15-2021 , 18:18   Re: [ANY] Little Anti-Cheat
Reply With Quote #407

Ok, I'll wait for the new version. Thank you
Fastkill91 is offline
J_Tanzanite
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Norway
Old 07-16-2021 , 16:03   Re: [ANY] Little Anti-Cheat
Reply With Quote #408

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastkill91 View Post
Ok, I'll wait for the new version. Thank you
Here's the new version, tell me if it works
https://github.com/J-Tanzanite/Littl...ses/tag/v1.7.1
J_Tanzanite is offline
Fastkill91
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Old 07-16-2021 , 18:21   Re: [ANY] Little Anti-Cheat
Reply With Quote #409

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Tanzanite View Post
Here's the new version, tell me if it works
https://github.com/J-Tanzanite/Littl...ses/tag/v1.7.1

I tested and added include vip modules, everything works fine. Thank you
If you need any help in testing anti-cheat for the cs go server, I can provide you with a server, write at any time I will be glad to help

Last edited by Fastkill91; 07-16-2021 at 18:37.
Fastkill91 is offline
finishlast
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: In Reno with the vitamin
Old 08-11-2021 , 12:28   Re: [ANY] Little Anti-Cheat
Reply With Quote #410

I use lilac with lilac_ban "0" and therefor the welcome message isn't working because you check for BAN to be enabled:

Welcome setting is 1 and shouldn't be connected to lilac_ban "0" - mb you did it for some reason, but logically I would assume setting welcome to 1 should always work , when lilac_enable "1".

I think that would make sense since the "macro detection kick" still works with lilac_ban "0", so the actual message "Protected by Lilac blablabla" is still valid then, even when lilac_ban "0" is set to 0.

So as I understood setting it to lilac_ban "0", it still kicks, so maybe instead of setting lilac_ban "0", it would be better to make something like

lilac_punishingmethod 1 /// 0 disable log only 1 ban 2 kick
lilac_bantime 15 / minutes or 0 perm
lilac_kicktime 15 / 1-x minutes

For the Welcome Message I just leave the ban out for now.

public Action timer_welcome(Handle timer, int userid)
{
int client = GetClientOfUserId(userid);

/* Todo: Considering there are log-only options now...
* Perhaps I should check if ANYTHING can ban at all. */
if (is_player_valid(client) && icvar[CVAR_WELCOME]
&& icvar[CVAR_ENABLE] )
PrintToChat(client, "[Lilac] %T", "welcome_msg", client, PLUGIN_VERSION);
}
__________________

Last edited by finishlast; 08-11-2021 at 12:35.
finishlast is offline
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:13.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Theme made by Freecode