[Mitchell]

why do we need more player slots, servers now can hardly handle the slots they are currently at without lagging out.

[Oshizu]

Originally Posted by Mitchell why do we need more player slots, servers now can hardly handle the slots they are currently at without lagging out.

Mann Vs Machine Duke Nukem Mode
8 Players
57 Bots at once charge

[Sreaper]

Originally Posted by Mitchell why do we need more player slots, servers now can hardly handle the slots they are currently at without lagging out.

I think it's only fair that TF2 should be allowed to host more slots considering Counter Strike: Source can host 64 slots. I haven't lagged on those servers either.

[MasterXykon]

Added attachment for those who want to mess with this.

[DrFallen]

Am I seeing this right. I added your server to HLSW and it says it can have 92 players on at one time. 0_0

[Tauphi]

Just a side node:

here at Saigns.de we earned a server ban for 1 month JUST for modifying the maxplayers value 2 years ago.
Server browser reported a number higher than 33 -> not possible in TF2 -> server ban.

I would be careful which things like that

[DrFallen]

Originally Posted by Tauphi Just a side node: here at Saigns.de we earned a server ban for 1 month JUST for modifying the maxplayers value 2 years ago. Server browser reported a number higher than 33 -> not possible in TF2 -> server ban. I would be careful which things like that

I'd assume that would be more to do with using it with QuickPlay w/ads that would make sense, If your using it for a fun with a bunch of friends I wouldn't see it being a huge deal. Hopefully the OP keeps us updated what happens

[MasterXykon]

Idk if it helps, but I've found the location of 3 errors.


"server_srv.so!CLagCompensationManager::CLagC ompensationManager(char const*) + 0x3f0"
seems to lead to:
"CUtlLinkedList<LagRecord,int,true,int,CUtlFi xedMemory<UtlLinkedListElem_t<LagRecord,int>> >::AllocInternal(bool)"


"server_srv.so!CLagCompensationManager::CLagC ompensationManager(char const*) + 0x4ff"
seems to lead to:
"CUtlLinkedList<LagRecord,int,true,int,CUtlFi xedMemory<UtlLinkedListElem_t<LagRecord,int>> >::AllocInternal(bool)"


"server_srv.so!CLagCompensationManager::Frame UpdatePostEntityThink() + 0x18f"
seems to lead to:
"CUtlLinkedList<LagRecord,int,true,int,CUtlFi xedMemory<UtlLinkedListElem_t<LagRecord,int>> >::InsertAfter(int)"




I also have a question, can I use DHooks with signatures instead of offsets?

[Oshizu]

Originally Posted by MasterXykon Idk if it helps, but I've found the location of 3 errors. "server_srv.so!CLagCompensationManager::CLagC ompensationManager(char const*) + 0x3f0" seems to lead to: "CUtlLinkedList<LagRecord,int,true,int,CUtlFi xedMemory<UtlLinkedListElem_t<LagRecord,int>> >::AllocInternal(bool)" "server_srv.so!CLagCompensationManager::CLagC ompensationManager(char const*) + 0x4ff" seems to lead to: "CUtlLinkedList<LagRecord,int,true,int,CUtlFi xedMemory<UtlLinkedListElem_t<LagRecord,int>> >::AllocInternal(bool)" "server_srv.so!CLagCompensationManager::Frame UpdatePostEntityThink() + 0x18f" seems to lead to: "CUtlLinkedList<LagRecord,int,true,int,CUtlFi xedMemory<UtlLinkedListElem_t<LagRecord,int>> >::InsertAfter(int)" I also have a question, can I use DHooks with signatures instead of offsets?

From what i've tried signatures does not seem to work on DHooks
You might need to built sourcemod extension with MM SourceHooks

[MasterXykon]

Well, I think the 35+ crash issue might be caused by bots (I've only tested with bots), I was messing around with some bot code because I didn't have enough people, and I got lucky.



36 players, me and 35 bots, without server crashing.
The issue with this, is that it seems to only work at random, so now I need to test this with 35+ real players so I can see if it works.

If you want to help, go to this IP: 192.99.32.150:27015