[M1R0n,M']

oh sorry, updated, tested = work

[DotPT]

Brazillian Portuguese translation. I had to change the word Acess to Crédito (Credit, same meaning as access) so it would be a good translation.

[bp] MENU_TITLE = Comprar Creditos MENU_MAP = Comprar Creditos para Mudar o Mapa MENU_BAN = Comprar Credtios para Banir MENU_CHAT = Comprar Creditos para Admin Chat MENU_KICK = Comprar Creditos para Kickar MENU_SLAY = Comprar Creditos para Slay MENU_VOTE = Comprar Creditos para Admin Votes NOMONEY = Precisa mais dinheiro para comprar esse credito! BUY_MAP = Comprou um credito para mudar o mapa! BUY_BAN = Comprou um credito para banir jogadores! BUY_CHAT = Comprou um credito para usar o chat de admin! BUY_KICK = Comprou um credito para kickar outros jogadores BUY_SLAY = Comprou um credito para matar outros jogadores BUY_VOTE = Comprou um credito para fazer votes de admin BUYOFF = O Plugin foi desactivado

Good plugin

[bow]

Originally Posted by M1R0n,M' oh sorry, updated, tested = work

So why i don't see other sections menu ?) Can you add user commands for other peoples ?

[hleV]

@bow, non-Steam?

[bow]

Originally Posted by hleV @bow, non-Steam?

yes )

[M1R0n,M']

hrr.. wait..

[anakin_cstrike]

PHP Code:

if(money > costa || money == costa)
//->
if( money >= costa )

// or you can simply :
if( money < costa) return; 


And is poorly coded @ public pshop(id,key).
Create the 'money' and 'costa' variable before you begin to check what key did he pressed.

And you can use a macro for fm_get_user_money.
And last but not least, you can use a single variable for all those cvars.

EDIT: Why are you doing this:

PHP Code:

if (g_Bought[id])
                            return; 


just in one case? do it before switching and it will be much better if you check if the player already has ban acces when he choose to buy it for instance.

[M1R0n,M']

Plugin,UPDATED'

[Hawk552]

Originally Posted by danielkza The code looks good enough for approval, there's just one thing you should change (not a deal breaker though): You don't need to calculate the length of the buffer yourself, contrary to popular belief, AMXX is smart enough to find out how much of the string is left, so you don't need to it yourself. So instead of this: new szBuffer[512], iLen; iLen = formatex(szBuffer, sizeof szBuffer - 1, "\rBuy \wAccess^n"); iLen += formatex(szBuffer[iLen], (sizeof szBuffer - 1) - iLen, "\r1\y. \wBuy Map Acces - \r%d$^n", get_pcvar_num(g_MapCost)); iLen += formatex(szBuffer[iLen], (sizeof szBuffer - 1) - iLen, "\r2\y. \wBuy Ban Acces - \r%d$^n", get_pcvar_num(g_BanCost)); iLen += formatex(szBuffer[iLen], (sizeof szBuffer - 1) - iLen, "\r3\y. \wBuy Chat Acces - \r%d$^n", get_pcvar_num(g_ChatCost)); iLen += formatex(szBuffer[iLen], (sizeof szBuffer - 1) - iLen, "\r4\y. \wBuy Kick Acces - \r%d$^n", get_pcvar_num(g_KickCost)); iLen += formatex(szBuffer[iLen], (sizeof szBuffer - 1) - iLen, "\r5\y. \wBuy Slay Acces - \r%d$^n", get_pcvar_num(g_SlayCost)); iLen += formatex(szBuffer[iLen], (sizeof szBuffer - 1) - iLen, "\r6\y. \wBuy Vote Acces - \r%d$^n", get_pcvar_num(g_VoteCost)); You can use this, that looks much better, and should be faster, as you avoid doing 6 subtractions, and because copy() and add() are faster than a unneeded format(): static szBuffer[512]; copy(szBuffer, charsmax(szBuffer), "\rBuy \wAccess^n"); format(szBuffer, charsmax(szBuffer), "%s\r1\y. \wBuy Map Access - \r%d$^n", szBuffer, get_pcvar_num(g_MapCost)); format(szBuffer, charsmax(szBuffer), "%s\r2\y. \wBuy Ban Access - \r%d$^n", szBuffer, get_pcvar_num(g_BanCost)); format(szBuffer, charsmax(szBuffer), "%s\r3\y. \wBuy Chat Access - \r%d$^n", szBuffer, get_pcvar_num(g_ChatCost)); format(szBuffer, charsmax(szBuffer), "%s\r4\y. \wBuy Kick Access - \r%d$^n", szBuffer, get_pcvar_num(g_KickCost)); format(szBuffer, charsmax(szBuffer), "%s\r5\y. \wBuy Slay Access - \r%d$^n", szBuffer, get_pcvar_num(g_SlayCost)); format(szBuffer, charsmax(szBuffer), "%s\r6\y. \wBuy Vote Access - \r%d$^n", szBuffer, get_pcvar_num(g_VoteCost)); add(szBuffer, charsmax(szBuffer), "\r0\y. \wExit");

This is probably a good order of magnitude slower if not more, depending on the length of the string.

Please revert this change.

[danielkza]

Originally Posted by Hawk552 This is probably a good order of magnitude slower if not more, depending on the length of the string. Please revert this change.

I'll do some tests and we can know how much slower it is, I'll post them soon.