[Raptor10]

Hi Kigen, I got the following error into logs can you hel pe pls ?

[SM] Native "CloseHandle" reported: Handle 1bad01e4 is invalid (error 3)
L 04/14/2009 - 00:211: [SM] Displaying call stack trace for plugin "kigen-ac-pub-nosockets.smx":
L 04/14/2009 - 00:211: [SM] [0] Line 1383, kigen-ac-pub.sp::KillTimers()
L 04/14/2009 - 00:211: [SM] [1] Line 690, kigen-ac-pub.sp::OnClientDisconnect_Post()
L 04/14/2009 - 00:212: Error log file session closed.

[ulx]

you can ignore those messages as they don't have any impact.

[Kigen]

Originally Posted by Koshy What is [Extension] Socket for?? The changelevel, ma_client exploit still crashes a server if you would like I can send you the exploit for trying to fix. Thanks, - koshy

Your free to send me any exploits you know of. It is possible though that said exploits are getting executed before KAC does. (i.e., there is a stack order on what plugin is called first for a hooked command like "say" for expample.)

[Koshy]

Hey Kigen someone just told me KAC catches it, but for some reason my server is refusing too =/ I'll PM you with details of the hack.

It should be perm ban for KAC ID:5.14 yes?

[rautamiekka]

Originally Posted by Koshy Hey Kigen someone just told me KAC catches it, I think because my rcon settings banned after like 2 failed attempts thats why KAC couldn't catch. It should be perm ban for KAC ID:5.14 yes?

1) Ban by KAC for changing RCON is worst idea, if you were suggesting that
2) I haven't had any problems with KAC not banning for sv_cheats

[Raptor10]

Just one question: the socket is for what ? What is going to change to use Kac with or without socket ?

thanks

[Koshy]

Originally Posted by rautamiekka 1) Ban by KAC for changing RCON is worst idea, if you were suggesting that 2) I haven't had any problems with KAC not banning for sv_cheats

Thats not what I'm suggesting... I'm saying RCON is banning rather then KAC and since RCON is banning rather then KAC (with sourcebans) when the server crashes from the hack they are able to rejoin after the server restarts because the ban was not "saved".

That is weird.... because:
L 04/13/2009 - 18:11:22: Bad CVar response! YOU GOT FUCKED UP (STEAM_0:1:1667502) has sv_cheats (sv_cheats) set to 1
L 04/13/2009 - 18:11:22: YOU GOT FUCKED UP (STEAM_0:1:1667502) was banned for cheating. KAC ID:5.14

But the player is not banned on sourcebans:
http://sourcebans.vorlondesigns.com/index.php?p=banlist

[rautamiekka]

Originally Posted by Raptor10 Just one question: the socket is for what ? What is going to change to use Kac with or without socket ? thanks

I already answered this for someone else, but seems this Forum is eating some of my posts cuz I couldn't find it ...


NoSockets vs Sockets Edition of KAC

1. NO Global Banlist
2. NO Updating
3. Possibly lower resource-eating on Server

[bug]

Originally Posted by Koshy Thats not what I'm suggesting... I'm saying RCON is banning rather then KAC and since RCON is banning rather then KAC (with sourcebans) when the server crashes from the hack they are able to rejoin after the server restarts because the ban was not "saved". That is weird.... because: L 04/13/2009 - 18:11:22: Bad CVar response! YOU GOT FUCKED UP (STEAM_0:1:1667502) has sv_cheats (sv_cheats) set to 1 L 04/13/2009 - 18:11:22: YOU GOT FUCKED UP (STEAM_0:1:1667502) was banned for cheating. KAC ID:5.14 But the player is not banned on sourcebans: http://sourcebans.vorlondesigns.com/index.php?p=banlist

I already told you it's a bug. They cheated and KAC logged it but it did not ban.

[Koshy]

Originally Posted by bug I already told you it's a bug. They cheated and KAC logged it but it did not ban.

I know you did but look what was said by:

Originally Posted by rautamiekka 1) Ban by KAC for changing RCON is worst idea, if you were suggesting that 2) I haven't had any problems with KAC not banning for sv_cheats

So thats why I responded to that because mine doesn't ban... where as his/hers does.

Also note they aren't simply "leaving" before getting banned, they are getting banned and being kicked.