Function Reference - Page 2

Peli · 06-24-2004 , 19:28

Let's keep the comments good guys , think hard on them.

synikal · 06-24-2004 , 19:34

awesome, thanks for posting this guys! on a similiar note, is the amxmodx version in cvs the pre-0.20 release? did you get the JIT compiler to work under linux?

PM · 06-25-2004 , 08:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by synikal

awesome, thanks for posting this guys! on a similiar note, is the amxmodx version in cvs the pre-0.20 release? did you get the JIT compiler to work under linux?

We were busy the last months; finishing the JIT doesn't seem to be a big deal (although I may be wrong here of course), but the testing would be the hardest part. I am afraid that JIT on linux will be a feature of a following AMXX version.

synikal · 06-25-2004 , 13:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synikal

awesome, thanks for posting this guys! on a similiar note, is the amxmodx version in cvs the pre-0.20 release? did you get the JIT compiler to work under linux?

We were busy the last months; finishing the JIT doesn't seem to be a big deal (although I may be wrong here of course), but the testing would be the hardest part. I am afraid that JIT on linux will be a feature of a following AMXX version.

Cool, well if you need some help testing, I've got some gdb experience and a dedicated linux server I could slap it on to.

ArtAttack · 06-25-2004 , 16:51

GREAT GREAT GREAT

Very useful indeed.
Now let's all open our notepads and let's work !!

EKS · 06-29-2004 , 09:55

yea. we need more plugins. What to make what to make

devicenull · 06-29-2004 , 15:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synikal

awesome, thanks for posting this guys! on a similiar note, is the amxmodx version in cvs the pre-0.20 release? did you get the JIT compiler to work under linux?

We were busy the last months; finishing the JIT doesn't seem to be a big deal (although I may be wrong here of course), but the testing would be the hardest part. I am afraid that JIT on linux will be a feature of a following AMXX version.

Alright, so I'll have to get my compiler working and compile JIT from the cvs for 0.20 for windows

CheesyPeteza · 07-09-2004 , 14:05

Would it be possible to extend the tree a bit so that we can give comments for separate constants in engine_const.inc. Some of them are completely unrelated. Plus when the new engfunc() native for 0.20 is put in those engine functions will definately require their own separate comments section.