[Dragokas]

Scag, cool!
I did same midHook without extension, uses SM Memory Extended, example.
However, I didn't put effort to provide use example with new opcode length disassembler to make it as convenient as your API. Technically it is doing the same.
Nice work!

Originally Posted by blueblur Hi, just one more question I've been wondering these days, can I detour and midhook a same function at the same time? (I guess probably not?)

Unless you (for some reason?) try detour/midhook same range of addresses (detour uses E9, - first 5 bytes from function EP) and then unhooking them NOT in vice versa order, everything will be ok.

[Vit_amin]

Doesn't work MidHookRegisters.Store have this code:

				mprotect(pBase, iSize);
				fill_nop(pBase, iSize);
				new MidHook(pBase, MidHookCB_IsVisible);
...
static stock void MidHookCB_IsVisible(MidHookRegisters hRegs)
{
	hRegs.Store(DHookRegister_ESP, MASK_VISIBLE_AND_NPCS, 0x08);
}

Noping this part of code:

C7 44 24 08 81 60 00 02                       mov     dword ptr [esp+8], 2006081h

So, detour now:

   0xf26013c6 <+694>:   e9 09 48 8f fb          jmp    0xedef5bd4
   0xf26013cb <+699>:   90                      nop
   0xf26013cc <+700>:   90                      nop
   0xf26013cd <+701>:   90                      nop

But when i try check esp+0x08 (used GDB)

x/wx $esp + 0x08
0xffff9198:     0x00000000

Via push ****
And set register value is good working order, example:

...
				mprotect(pBase, iSize);
				fill_nop(pBase, iSize);
				StoreToAddress(pBase, 0x57, NumberType_Int8);	// push edi

				new MidHook(pBase, MidHookCB_IsVisible);
			}
		}
	}
}

static stock void MidHookCB_IsVisible(MidHookRegisters hRegs)
{
	hRegs.Set(DHookRegister_EDI, MASK_VISIBLE_AND_NPCS);
}