[Crone]

Hello,

I have two typ´s of bans where I want to know what they are and if the detections are correct...

[smac_cvars.smx | 0.8.4.1] XXX (ID: XXXX | IP: XXXXX) returned query result "Not found" (expected Okay) on convar "mem_force_flush" (value "").

and

[smac_eyetest.smx | 0.8.4.0] XXX (ID: XXX | IP: XXX) was banned for tampering with an old movement command (tickcount). CmdNum: 2087 | [57830:57804:57839]

[smac_eyetest.smx | 0.8.4.0] XXX (ID: XXX | IP: XXX) was banned for reusing old movement commands. CmdNum: 235 PrevCmdNum: 1556 | [111108:111093:111114]

I hope you could explain what this mean... and if this detections are correct because I have a lots of detection for using old movement command´s.

Thanks and sorry for my bad english

[SystematicMania]

Hello,

The detection on mem_force_flush should be valid assuming an update didn't remove it. You can check whether it exists by typing mem_force_flush into console and seeing whether it returns anything.

The two cmdnum bans are valid.