Raised This Month: $ Target: $400
 0% 

Suggestion


Post New Thread Reply   
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Author Message
TheAvengers2
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 2011
Old 11-23-2011 , 18:22   Suggestion
Reply With Quote #1

Hey GoD-Tony, I'd suggest adding some sort of simple cache to SMAC in order to reduce the likelihood of actions being logged and the punishment being carried out numerous times for the same instance.


I've seen things like this far too many times in my logs:

Code:
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_mode
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_mode
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next
L 10/22/2011 - 11:54:40: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next
L 10/22/2011 - 11:54:40: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next
L 10/22/2011 - 11:54:40: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next
L 10/22/2011 - 11:54:40: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next
I don't think it's very likely that the individual managed to reconnect multiple times within a second. I've also seen individuals receive multiple bans for a single convar violation on SourceBans. I'm fairly sure that the individuals are receiving multiple bans for the same instance since the timestamps on the bans are always the same. However, this appears to only occur occasionally and isn't as prevalent of a problem in comparison to the logs being constantly spammed out.

I hope you'll take my suggestion into consideration,
Thank you.

Last edited by GoD-Tony; 11-30-2011 at 08:36. Reason: Removed private details
TheAvengers2 is offline
GoD-Tony
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Old 11-24-2011 , 03:47   Re: Suggestion
Reply With Quote #2

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheAvengers2 View Post
I've seen things like this far too many times in my logs:

Code:
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next 
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_next 
L 10/22/2011 - 11:44:35: *** snip *** was kicked for command spamming: spec_mode
I don't think it's very likely that the individual managed to reconnect multiple times within a second.
Have you had this happen since 0.7.1.5? I ask because your log is older than the version linked. (first reported here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheAvengers2 View Post
I've also seen individuals receive multiple bans for a single convar violation on SourceBans. I'm fairly sure that the individuals are receiving multiple bans for the same instance since the timestamps on the bans are always the same.
I'll look into this.
__________________

Last edited by GoD-Tony; 11-30-2011 at 10:21. Reason: Removed private details
GoD-Tony is offline
TheAvengers2
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 2011
Old 11-24-2011 , 04:51   Re: Suggestion
Reply With Quote #3

Ughhh, I'm guessing not... Do me a favor and make this thread here disappear from existence.

Thanks.

Last edited by TheAvengers2; 11-24-2011 at 04:53.
TheAvengers2 is offline
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:47.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Theme made by Freecode