[8guawong]

Originally Posted by Fyren This needs to be strlen(convar_string) - 1. No. Edit: To be clear, switching on a char is fine.

so thats one benefit of new syntax over old syntax?

[Fyren]

Originally Posted by 8guawong so thats one benefit of new syntax over old syntax?

You can pick an individual character out of a string (e.g. switch (str[0]) {}) or use a variable that most people wouldn't call "a string" (e.g. new String:s = 'a'; switch (s) {}) with old syntax.