[JocAnis]

Server Demo Rules

Main idea of the plugin is to force player to have recorded demo for whole his playing on the server, in case he got banned by mistake by the admins, so he can upload and can prove he is totally clear (is he?).

But how will admins know if he cheated in his demo?

- There comes this demo checking tool: Unreal Demo Scanner https://goldsrc.ru/threads/4627/
It is parsing every POV demos and tries to detect cheats/hacks (i think it searchs for AIM, WH, Bhop and other stuff), its made by karaulov, so credits to him

Subject Opinion

Without the Unreal Demo Scanner combined with this plugin I dont see any usage of this plugin. Of course Unreal Demo Scanner is not perfectly detecting cheaters but mostly it can, I hope others can support it too

Plugin Stuff

Image, when player connects on server: https://imgur.com/9o1pqMw
Only one cvar: demo_prefix (default is "Public" ) //name it how is your server named, but keep it one word-simple
Example of the demoname you would have: Public_de_dust_20-10-2020_02-10.dem


Any suggestion or critic is welcome.

PS: If player does 'stop' in console - plugin will kick him with message of his last recorded demo. Also owners could add rule: 'You must have Welcome message in your demo when sending it', so in that way players cant bypass/trick the plugin I guess

[DruGzOG]

Is this not slowhacking?

[Mordekay]

No, as you don't change cvars or anything.
But if I see the format of the demoname it is wasting discspace.
You should reorder it to just (servername)_mapname. So only one record for each map is saved and they get overwritten. As only the last demo is important this is more than enough.

[tarsisd2]

i woudn`t use Unreal Demo Scanner, i tested, got my own demo and gave false detect

[JocAnis]

@Mordekay, i totally agree, will do that in next version, thanks

@tarsid2, i also tested some months ago and it gave some false results, but with reporting to author its fixed now...did you test the latest version of it or?

[tarsisd2]

Originally Posted by JocAnis @Mordekay, i totally agree, will do that in next version, thanks @tarsid2, i also tested some months ago and it gave some false results, but with reporting to author its fixed now...did you test the latest version of it or?

yes, i have being testing since the start and posting logs too, but i`m getting a lot of false detect, so i rather not yet, but whoever wants to use it

[karaulov]

Originally Posted by tarsisd2 yes, i have being testing since the start and posting logs too, but i`m getting a lot of false detect, so i rather not yet, but whoever wants to use it

Please report false detection : https://github.com/2020karaulov2020/...anner/issues/7 if you really got false detect
But before use please read description.
Latest version : 1.52 beta 9

[tarsisd2]

Originally Posted by karaulov Please report false detection : https://github.com/2020karaulov2020/...anner/issues/7 if you really got false detect But before use please read description. Latest version : 1.52 beta 9

i tested the lastest version is really better from before, still giving few false detect but is not much, great work, i will post the results later, great job