Quote:
Originally Posted by abrandnewday
Nah, decent approach was to release it here.[...]
|
Okay, apparently there's no point in talking to you so I'll keep it at this one reply.
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrandnewday
[...]As was said before, the duck journals were pointless as fuck. There was no reward for levelling them up, so creating a plugin to rapid-spawn ducks to level your journal up was fine and dandy.[...]
|
So as long as you value something as pointless (not whoever owns the system), you can do whatever you want to it? gj
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrandnewday
[...]The two main causes for concern were:
1. Valve saw it as cheating without hacking
2. All the spawning was mildly DDoSing the Steam servers, which nobody using the plugins accounted for. Jessecar and Geel of Scrap.tf were probably the two biggest offenders behind the mild DDoSing because they kept pushing the limits of how quickly they could spawn ducks in an attempt to hit the highest XP amount possible. They probably won't admit any of that, but it's true. I sat in their Scrap.tf chatroom watching them brag about it, and when asked how they were spawning ducks so quickly, they refused to say anything.[...]
|
I'm not sure if this is even supposed to be a counter-argument. You're pretty much establishing my point here. Not only do you point out that one could see this as cheating, you also say that the exploit caused a denial of service on Valve's side. So not only were you disturbing their economy but were also preventing them from keeping up their basic services.
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrandnewday
[...]Oh you're one of THOSE people. That explains a lot.[...]
|
So basically when you run out of points to make you but people in drawers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrandnewday
[...]Don't be blaming me for Team Fortress 2 Classic, it's not MY project.[...]
|
You actively support the project and manage the facepunch thread. While you might not do the actual infringement your stance is clear as hell for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrandnewday
[...]As for republishing illegally leaked code, other people have done it in the past and even Greenlit projects made with the leaked code. Our team has been actively trying to get in touch with Valve to show them what work we've done thus far, and to get a potential OK for the project to continue along as planned.[...]
|
To keep it short:
The code was leaked. Valve owns the rights to it and distribution of it is illegal. As long as there is no written permission the situation doesn't change. Good luck getting one btw, there is a reason you haven't so far.
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrandnewday
[...]It's people with your mindset[...]
|
How dare I question (anything in general or in particular in this case) if this is legal for just one second? See the tl;dr above for what the status quo is. Of course there are valid concerns, otherwise "the people behind the project" wouldn't ask for permission (in retrospect apparently, that's nice BTW). Also as you said I'm not the one who "came up with it", so to speak.
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrandnewday
[...]Yeah that's smart, let's kill off funding for the many people trying to make a living off of server hosting. Real smart. Why don't you go to those people's homes and take food off their tables.[...]
|
Many servers have P2W vip systems. Many servers are managed by 16yr spoiled kids (this is not a joke, look around, pandacommunity for example). A donation by definition comes with no benefits. A donation itself is not to be bound to any services in exchange. What these communities offer is a service which they fraudulently mislabel as a donation so they can't be held accountable for availability and therefore targeted by paypal's cashback system. If they want to fund their servers, they can do it by accepting actual donations, or declaring what they are
selling as a paid service with limited availability. There would be no harm done.
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrandnewday
[...]Personally speaking, I don't ask for monetary donations on my servers. It's either 1, 2, 3 or 7 keys based on the rank. I turn around and unbox stuff with those keys and often raffle the unboxed items off, or if I'm in need of cash, I'll sell the keys.[...]
|
Since keys are goods of monetary value, there is no difference. So if you're asking for key donations in return for services, it's the same bs.
I also host servers for people at 4 keys per month (for one gameserver, add 1 key for each additional server) and I host 5 people. I don't need help "keeping my servers alive". I pay $40/month (2 dedicated servers at $20/each) and can handle that just fine without donations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrandnewday
[...]But hey, PayPal knows damn well about gameservers and donations and even if they were to change their stance on it out of the blue, there's many other sites one can use in its place.
|
And where is that written on paper? PayPal
might know of the problem that is intentionally mislabeled payments. They might as well have the stance that a filehoster has when it comes to illegal downloads. "We can't automatically detect and forbid stuff, but if you report it, we can and have to act upon it"
But then again, clearly you lack perspective and skepticism. You'd rather lash out and put everyone with
concerns into the moron category. Way to represent yourself, and way to represent the project. So I'm done with you.
So, basically, as asherkin suggested clearly this whole thing is two sides of a coin. Thanks for supplying us with an example of the other side. Valve who shuts us out, and certain people in the community who to some degree force their hand to do so. So here's the victims:
-AM
-The gamers
-Decent communities and modders
__________________