[GoD-Tony]

I have moved the aimbot module discussion into it's own thread.

[CenT]

My results in 2 days test the aimbot, I attached the file smac.log

[GoD-Tony]

Originally Posted by CenT My results in 2 days test the aimbot, I attached the file smac.log

Were you able to confirm if any of them were aimbotting?

Edit: One guy had it trigger 3 times at once. Must be a nade kill or something. Might be a bug.

[CenT]

No, some of which have been detected are regulars on the server, others I do not know.

[niar82k]

example from our server:

L 05/24/2011 - 19:07:08: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (156 degree snap)
L 05/24/2011 - 19:075: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (155 degree snap)
L 05/24/2011 - 19:08:22: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (156 degree snap)
L 05/24/2011 - 19:11:21: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap)
L 05/24/2011 - 19:12:03: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap)
L 05/24/2011 - 19:12:15: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap)
L 05/24/2011 - 19:12:17: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap)
L 05/24/2011 - 19:12:20: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap)
L 05/24/2011 - 19:12:23: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap)
L 05/24/2011 - 19:12:44: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap)

This Player was using an real Aimbot and many more players are detected!

[CenT]

For me the one who made ​​the biggest impact is:

L 05/24/2011 - 23:54:09: DuckyBalls (ID: STEAM_0:0:9381658 | IP: 89.80.145.14) is suspected of having an aimbot (155 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 23:54:41: DuckyBalls (ID: STEAM_0:0:9381658 | IP: 89.80.145.14) is suspected of having an aimbot (156 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 23:55:00: DuckyBalls (ID: STEAM_0:0:9381658 | IP: 89.80.145.14) is suspected of having an aimbot (155 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 23:553: DuckyBalls (ID: STEAM_0:0:9381658 | IP: 89.80.145.14) is suspected of having an aimbot (156 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 23:55:44: DuckyBalls (ID: STEAM_0:0:9381658 | IP: 89.80.145.14) is suspected of having an aimbot (156 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 23:55:54: DuckyBalls (ID: STEAM_0:0:9381658 | IP: 89.80.145.14) is suspected of having an aimbot (156 degree snap)

Are there really aimbot? I do not know i was not there to see ...

If you can say what you think.

[niar82k]

Originally Posted by CenT For me the one who made ​​the biggest impact is: Are there really aimbot? I do not know i was not there to see ... If you can say what you think.

The Player use a Aimbot! The Demo can be Downloaded here:

http://sourceban.team-wb.de/getdemo.php?type=B&id=18395

[GoD-Tony]

Thanks for all of the reports! I think 10 detections and then a ban is an appropriate number. Should this value be controlled with a Cvar? It might not be initially but can be added if requested.

Do you prefer if we keep the warnings/logs in there as well? Or should they be removed?

Originally Posted by CenT Are there really aimbot? I do not know i was not there to see ... If you can say what you think.

That person was most likely aimbotting. A Google search of his SteamID shows he is on several banlists for cheating.

[CenT]

Originally Posted by GoD-Tony Thanks for all of the reports! I think 10 detections and then a ban is an appropriate number. Should this value be controlled with a Cvar? It might not be initially but can be added if requested. Do you prefer if we keep the warnings/logs in there as well? Or should they be removed? That person was most likely aimbotting. A Google search of his SteamID shows he is on several banlists for cheating.

Yes you are right

We must let the logs enabled for detection, it will allow us to better monitor our servers and thus can be relate to another possible connection aimbot. The number of detections for the ban of the player who aimbot should be adjustable through a cvar.

[Xp3r7]

Yea, I get 1 to 3 detections randomly on some people but when there is a real aimbotter, Ill have like 15 lines altogether of that single person.