Raised This Month: $153 Target: $400
 38% 

SmallC


Post New Thread Reply   
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Author Message
Dygear
SourceMod Donor
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Levittown, NY
Old 05-30-2005 , 22:24   SmallC
Reply With Quote #1

What kind of support for SmallC can we expect?
Are you going to use SmallC 2.7.3?
Are we looking at get_user_info type functions?
Could MetaEng, with a AMX style function set, replace SM?
__________________
Dygear is offline
Send a message via AIM to Dygear Send a message via MSN to Dygear Send a message via Skype™ to Dygear
BAILOPAN
Join Date: Jan 2004
Old 05-30-2005 , 22:39  
Reply With Quote #2

1. Has nothing to do with SourceMM...
2. MetaEng is only a concept, and it's the concept behind SourceMod.
3. It's "Small", not "SmallC"

I don't plan on too much Small/AMX support for SM. The compiler is really poorly written, is difficult to maintain, and is full of bugs. Support for the machine is lackluster. Thiadmer does not have clear update schedules or any policy on fixing bugs. That's fine by me, because it's an open source project. But considering the huge amount of bugs in the software, it's not good. He does a good job fixing things, but it's not in a timely manner.

So while I like Thiadmer and I think Small was a good idea, I don't think it's "production ready" as something cross platform and easy to maintain.
__________________
egg
BAILOPAN is offline
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Theme made by Freecode