[anxiro]

XAD, I know the code is wrong - I edited on purpose.
----
@others:
It will not detect clean gamers if you change the code a bit.
Change the -1 to something like:

if (test1=="0") {
...
}
and the part if it's higher than 0. like 1,2,3 etc.


It will not detect clean gamers for the second time, because they do not have these CVAR names. and yes, this IS tested on a LAN server with 2 guys with hacks and 3 guys without hacks. The hackers got detected.

I told you that I edited the code, read again.
Just edit it, and test it yourself. it worked fine and a lot of real cheaters were banned from the server. I even have proof emails which ppl say: "sorry can i please be unbanned? my brother did play" -- an old excuse

Just ppl, just edit the code and test it.
Go on a LAN server and test a hack or just make some CVAR names which the hacks will use *as we did also*.


So why all the llame posts about: "An example for worst code - dont use it, just laugh about it" -- thats one you should laugh about if you didn't read the first post.

[anxiro]

I know. And i also told it's an idea and I'm not a pro. coders should post their edited code in here?

[Fruchtzwerg]

Originally Posted by anxiro It will not detect clean gamers if you change the code a bit. Change the -1 to something like: if (test1=="0") { ... } and the part if it's higher than 0. like 1,2,3 etc.

Please, dont try to code C/C++. You dont know what a pointer is, you did not realize what XAD told you. If you have good ideas, then tell it us with your own words, because your coding skills are just bad.

[manorastroman]

way to be helpful, try telling how he can clean up his code and stuff, otherwise, dont bash him about it. It's not helping at all.

[anxiro]

I was asked to share the source.
I asked for any help, not llame posts
And like other ppl told, it's an idea if it works..

Fruchtzwerg, why don't you edit it then, you've got a lot of complaints.
Tell us how it shall work then.

[anxiro]

My idea was:

- Player is connecting
- Server will scan for these CVAR/Settings
- If found, the player will get banned and disconnected
- Players in game will get a notice that someone is banned <name> <id> for cheating.


That was my idea. And VAC is not updating every week, this 'scan' can be updated whenever you want to. VAC is scanning for "background running progresses". This 'scan' is just checking the values.

You also can detect scripts, like norecoil and clientchanges *with programs you can change the clients'memory*. So, this is something else than VAC.

Anyone?

[Sekkusu]

This would've come in handy back when myg0t posted the sv_cheats runaround that lets the client change their sv_cheats value with a simple memory editor, allowing them to do client side cheats (render stuff, wireframes, etc.) by freezing it at 1 even when the server sets it to 0. This could've found players who did this and banned them.

[anxiro]

Thats what I mean. I read that as well.
They use a memory-editor/HEX whatever. Only works on servers without sv_cheats And myg0t is changing their names as well!

[Sekkusu]

I really don't mind myg0t, but as soon as they start fucking around with my players on my server I start binding their keys and changing their aliases until even they don't know what the fuck is going on when they try to shoot someone and they die.

[anxiro]

Originally Posted by Sekkusu I really don't mind myg0t, but as soon as they start fucking around with my players on my server I start binding their keys and changing their aliases until even they don't know what the fuck is going on when they try to shoot someone and they die.

I do something else: "admin_ban myg0t".
But what we try to say is that cheaters, not only fagging myg0t, are using memoryhacks. It's like using wireframe while sv_cheats is not on etc.