[MAGNAT2645]

That's why i would prefer to just return a Function pointer directly (instead of storing all these handles) but i think i need to rewrite ItemBehavior code to use forwards.

[DJ Tsunami]

Well Call_StartFunction requires a plugin handle and a Function pointer anyway, so you would need to return both things. And I imagine the point of RegItemBehavior is to store these things, so it's cleaner to use forwards or Call_StartFunction in the same plugin to call them.

[MAGNAT2645]

But there would be no difference in storing values.
Now i have this (just removed FuncUnequip because moved it to FuncEquip as boolean):

enum struct ItemBehavior {
	char Token[ MAX_ITEM_TOKEN_LENGTH ];
	Handle Owner;
	PrivateForward FuncUse;
	PrivateForward FuncEquip;
	PrivateForward FuncTrade;
	PrivateForward FuncSell;
	PrivateForward FuncDrop;
}

Just replaced Function with PrivateForward.