[PaFcIo]

Originally Posted by ditmesteam He is the man make one plugin for anticheat for both of non steam and steam server. I sure many steams server use his plugin and it mean he helped steam for anticheat and he help many things for this forum. If admin ban other man not help for this forum and for steam game, nobody say anythings.

^
He should use the STEAM server!


Hm, OT has its own web site?

@Edit: OT got ban pernament?
Will ever unbans?

[alias_retaer]

Originally Posted by Hawk552 All banning ot_207 did was shoot the community in the foot. He was a relatively productive and useful member of this board and showed no indication of making it difficult for other people through his supposed use of non-Steam. I think you've lost sight of the original objective of this rule. It was really only to make giving out support easier as people with non-Steam are extremely difficult to help. This board would never be under any threat of legal action from Valve even if it stated that it actively supported non-Steam. I agree with banning people who are using non-Steam and being disruptive (even if it's something as simple as asking for support and using it). But banning them just for having it, especially in ot_207's case, I think is going overboard.

I fully agree!

[10101010]

Originally Posted by devicenull I don't randomly go digging into every user's profile to determine if they use steam or not. I don't want to reveal my methods, but lets just say you they are effective. I also tend to err on the side of not banning someone, if I can't tell for sure either way. Just to give you an idea of the number of nonsteam users, this "cleanup" took me an hour.. and I could probably still be going.

If you want to have fun banning an HUGE AMOUNT OF USERS, look...oh wait I just got banned.

[Roach]

Hi sawce,

I missed this thread. I see you are a snail. I am a porcupine.

[01010111]

Originally Posted by 10101010 If you want to have fun banning an HUGE AMOUNT OF USERS, look...oh wait I just got banned.

Oh, I didn't know that nowadays they banned people who is against no-steam and supports the rules.

I don't know , but admins supporting no-steam and banning steam users who says that its full of no-steams is something new.

So what roach, now the rule is

Steam = No support?

[Hawk552]

Originally Posted by 01010111 Oh, I didn't know that nowadays they banned people who is against no-steam and supports the rules. I don't know , but admins supporting no-steam and banning steam users who says that its full of no-steams is something new. So what roach, now the rule is Steam = No support?

No, it's "Need support = No support".