Raised This Month: $32 Target: $400
 8% 

~containi and != -1


Post New Thread Reply   
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Author Message
Freezo Begin
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Morocco
Old 04-22-2015 , 17:09   ~containi and != -1
Reply With Quote #1

So when i was in my computer ...
I have compared
this

if(contain(x,x) != -1)

With this

if(~contain(x,x))

They give me the same result , my questions is :

1- Why it gives the same result
2- who is faster ?
Freezo Begin is offline
fysiks
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Flatland, USA
Old 04-22-2015 , 18:42   Re: ~containi and != -1
Reply With Quote #2

Only one is correct . . . why are you playing with random characters with random code?
__________________

Last edited by fysiks; 04-22-2015 at 18:42.
fysiks is offline
Old 04-22-2015, 18:44
Freezo Begin
This message has been deleted by Freezo Begin.
Freezo Begin
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Morocco
Old 04-22-2015 , 19:16   Re: ~containi and != -1
Reply With Quote #3

its not a random character ...

Last edited by Freezo Begin; 04-23-2015 at 02:26.
Freezo Begin is offline
fysiks
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Flatland, USA
Old 04-22-2015 , 19:20   Re: ~containi and != -1
Reply With Quote #4

To understand why it works, you have to understand signed integers and how they are represented as two's complement as well as a bitwise NOT.

The difference in speed, if any, is negligible (that basically means you'll never notice a difference in your program). I.e. the time it takes to execute the comparison is probably many order of magnitudes smaller than the the time it takes to run contain[i]().

Because it gives you no benefit, all you are doing by using it that way is obfuscating your code.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freezo Begin View Post
you are just saying bullshit .
No different from your excuses in that other thread . . .
__________________

Last edited by fysiks; 04-22-2015 at 19:23.
fysiks is offline
claudiuhks
Yam Inside®™℠
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Living Randomly
Old 04-22-2015 , 20:11   Re: ~containi and != -1
Reply With Quote #5

Sometimes ~0 is used for Unsigned Int types, to assign -1 value to an Unsigned type of variable.

int i = -1; // correct
unsigned int i = -1; // incorrect
unsigned int i = ~0; // correct

Related http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1...n-winsock2-h-c
__________________

Last edited by claudiuhks; 04-22-2015 at 20:17.
claudiuhks is offline
Send a message via MSN to claudiuhks Send a message via Yahoo to claudiuhks Send a message via Skype™ to claudiuhks
fysiks
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Flatland, USA
Old 04-22-2015 , 20:16   Re: ~containi and != -1
Reply With Quote #6

Quote:
Originally Posted by claudiuhks View Post
Sometimes ~0 is used for Unsigned Int types, to assign -1 value to an Unsigned type of variable.

int i = -1; // correct
unsigned int i = -1; // incorrect
unsigned int i = ~0; // correct
~0 is just the largest possible number when it's an unsigned int so it's not assigning a value of -1 (just to be clear) since -1 is not a possible value for an unsigned integer. I'm sure you could cast it to a signed in at some point but that's just confusing for people who don't understand how numbers are represented in binary.
__________________
fysiks is offline
claudiuhks
Yam Inside®™℠
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Living Randomly
Old 04-22-2015 , 20:23   Re: ~containi and != -1
Reply With Quote #7

Quote:
Originally Posted by fysiks View Post
~0 is just the largest possible number when it's an unsigned int so it's not assigning a value of -1 (just to be clear) since -1 is not a possible value for an unsigned integer. I'm sure you could cast it to a signed in at some point but that's just confusing for people who don't understand how numbers are represented in binary.
Well yes, I meant the printable value. ~0, 0xFFFFFFFF, ... prints and formats -1 and can be assigned to unsigned types.
We should consider your post.

Overall, it has nothing special so it can be used along contain/ containi.
__________________

Last edited by claudiuhks; 04-22-2015 at 20:26.
claudiuhks is offline
Send a message via MSN to claudiuhks Send a message via Yahoo to claudiuhks Send a message via Skype™ to claudiuhks
fysiks
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Flatland, USA
Old 04-22-2015 , 20:48   Re: ~containi and != -1
Reply With Quote #8

Quote:
Originally Posted by claudiuhks View Post
Overall, it has nothing special so it can be used along contain/ containi.
Like I said before, I wouldn't recommend it here because it obfuscates the code making it unreadable.
__________________
fysiks is offline
hornet
AMX Mod X Plugin Approver
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Australia
Old 04-22-2015 , 21:19   Re: ~containi and != -1
Reply With Quote #9

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freezo Begin View Post
This doesnt help me at all .
its not a random character ...
you are just saying bullshit .
He's trying to work out what you actually want to avoid an XY problem, so don't be so disrespectful.
__________________
Quote:
vBulletin Tip #42: Not much would be accomplished by merging this item with itself.
hornet is offline
Freezo Begin
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Morocco
Old 04-23-2015 , 03:22   Re: ~containi and != -1
Reply With Quote #10

So its bitwise NOT ( ~ ) . So it will flip all the other bits ( 0 -> 1 ) .

@fysiks
Why you dont recommend to use it ?

@claudiuhks
So how can i get the time of execute ?
Freezo Begin is offline
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:07.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Theme made by Freecode