[asherkin]

Originally Posted by U#0 BTW: Why in console i see:But players banned permanently.

The permanent ban is handled by SourceBans, the 5 minute ban is to stop the server spamming your SourceBans install to check if the client is banned should they try and reconnect.

[j0s3ph]

Hm, im speculating over 100% detection rate. Today two players were banned from my server. And one of them is clean, i say.

This plugin bans players, who have spinning crosshair or have zero recoil when fired a weapon, right?

P.S.: We are talking about CS:S

[Kigen]

The eye test was designed to test a clients view angles. The specific cheat feature that was being detected by it was "anti-aimbot". Which is designed for hack vs hack play since setting pitch or roll to 180 degrees puts the head hitbox inside the chest. Its impractical outside of hack vs hack play. But "rage" cheaters enable it anyway when they go onto a server to piss everyone off.

The reason why its default disabled in KAC now is because when the OB update came out for CS:S the limiter preventing pitch and roll angles past 90 degrees was removed from the client. So its legit possible for clients to bypass the 90 degrees now.

[GoD-Tony]

Originally Posted by j0s3ph Hm, im speculating over 100% detection rate. Today two players were banned from my server. And one of them is clean, i say. This plugin bans players, who have spinning crosshair or have zero recoil when fired a weapon, right? P.S.: We are talking about CS:S

You can post the logs here if you want and I'll take a look, but unless you are running unusual custom content on your server, then it's most likely correct.

Originally Posted by Kigen The eye test was designed to test a clients view angles. The specific cheat feature that was being detected by it was "anti-aimbot". Which is designed for hack vs hack play since setting pitch or roll to 180 degrees puts the head hitbox inside the chest. Its impractical outside of hack vs hack play. But "rage" cheaters enable it anyway when they go onto a server to piss everyone off.

NoRecoil/NoSpread cheats that don't trim the angles in their math are also red-flags, and these are still common. As are the anti-aim features left enabled by default.

Originally Posted by Kigen So its legit possible for clients to bypass the 90 degrees now.

Possible in what sense? Sure the game has the ability to go past those limits, but it doesn't happen during regular gameplay.

Edit: Hi Kigen

[Kigen]

Yes, it happens. If a client is already looking straight down or up its possible. Getting shot in the head. Falling. Those things can push it past that 90 degree boundary.

Originally Posted by GoD-Tony NoRecoil/NoSpread cheats that don't trim the angles in their math are also red-flags, and these are still common. As are the anti-aim features left enabled by default.

Just saying why I created it. The detection of no-recoil/spread was a bonus.

[GoD-Tony]

Originally Posted by Kigen Yes, it happens. If a client is already looking straight down or up its possible. Getting shot in the head. Falling. Those things can push it past that 90 degree boundary.

Those conditions are already accounted for in SMAC.

[Baron Rojo]

L 02/15/2012 - 172:54: [smac_eyetest.smx] ✗f!5h✗ (ID: STEAM a | IP: b) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 28 -397 0
L 02/15/2012 - 173:24: [smac_eyetest.smx] ✗f!5h✗ (ID: STEAM a| IP: b) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 2 -409 0

the same person, i don't know him verywell , mmm that?2 times detects that he is cheating, is 2 good number for be sure he was cheating? Is a css server

update :


L 02/19/2012 - 13:43:18: [smac_eyetest.smx] Sp[A] EsL top 5. (ID: STEAM_0:1:49005157 | IP: 78.155.11.123) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: -0 -464 0
L 02/19/2012 - 1428: [smac_eyetest.smx] Sp[A] EsL top 5. (ID: STEAM_0:1:49005157 | IP: 78.155.11.123) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 179 -12 0

[GoD-Tony]

Originally Posted by Baron Rojo the same person, i don't know him verywell , mmm that?2 times detects that he is cheating, is 2 good number for be sure he was cheating? Is a css server

They are cheating. Edit: Name history -> "Je Cheat et J'aime"

[Baron Rojo]

thank you very much , this really work today a rage cheater came to my server and this and aimbot module detect him , but he was abble to speedhack .

Thx for developing this anticheat

[j0s3ph]

Hi Tony, pls take a look at this:

L 02/22/2012 - 17:01:13: [smac_eyetest.smx] OÂşÂ°â€˜Â¨VIKYÂ¨â€˜Â°ÂşO (ID: STEAM_0:0:13378138 | IP: 109.202.82.135) was banned for cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 180 144 0
L 02/22/2012 - 17:01:13: [smac_eyetest.smx] - Map: de_dust2 | AbsOrigin: 447.9 2224.0 -126.5 | AbsAngles: 0.0 -95.6 0.0 | Weapon: weapon_usp | Team: 3 | Latency: 100ms

Cheat or false detection?