[Emp`]

Arkshine, I think it would help him if you made a CvarType_Flags that would essentially do read_flags when the cvar is updated.

[Arkshine]

Yep, I thought the same thing.

About the hook, he's right, it should call the forward the first time and what I've done is wrong/not complete.

Will update today.

[Tirant]

Originally Posted by Arkshine Yep, I thought the same thing. About the hook, he's right, it should call the forward the first time and what I've done is wrong/not complete. Will update today.

I look forward to it

[Arkshine]

Another small update !

v1.3 - 8 sept 2011

Bug

• Fixed a wrong/incomplete implementation where a new registered hook should call right away the forward (by default).
  Also added a new param ignoreFirstCall (false by default) for CvarHookChange/CvarHookChangeAll natives to disable this behavior.

New feature

• Added a new cvar type CvarType_Flags to be used with CvarCache native which will convert the cvar's value into a sum of bits like does read_flags.

Note #1 : The examples of use with CvarCache have been updated also.

Tirant, is it working as expected now ?

[Tirant]

Originally Posted by Arkshine Another small update ! v1.3 - 8 sept 2011 Bug Fixed a wrong/incomplete implementation where a new registered hook should call right away the forward (by default). Also added a new param ignoreFirstCall (false by default) for CvarHookChange/CvarHookChangeAll natives to disable this behavior. New feature Added a new cvar type CvarType_Flags to be used with CvarCache native which will convert the cvar's value into a sum of bits like does read_flags. Note #1 : The examples of use with CvarCache have been updated also. Tirant, is it working as expected now ?

Well, I had to write a new version of read_flags, because I needed to use 32 bits in order to have it work for weapons. I appreciate it though. Event functions are being called properly also.

[Arkshine]

Oh well, I'm sure it will be useful for others people.

Since you have an eagle eye, don't hesitate to report bugs and proposing new functionnalities !

[Tirant]

Originally Posted by Arkshine Oh well, I'm sure it will be useful for others people. Since you have an eagle eye, don't hesitate to report bugs and proposing new functionnalities !

Since you mention it... It might be useful to have a special native for registering boolean cvars. It would basically just lock the given cvar to min 0.0, max 1.0. Most cvars are 0/1. I know you can do it now, but automating it would make it easier IMO.

[Arkshine]

So you're asking simply a stock with CvarRegister with the params already configured for with a min/max ? You say automating but it just a matter to setup the params. Unless you're talking beeing more readable, I'm not sure to follow you.

[nikhilgupta345]

Does CvarHookChangeCache no longer exist?

[Arkshine]

It was a typo in the documentation. It's actually CvarCache.