[Relaxing]

I already know how to do this.

[HamletEagle]

You could just search for get_user_name and see how it's used. Probably 80% of plugins are using this native...

[Craxor]

#include <amxmodx>

new const gszName[] = "loopback";


public client_putinserver( id )
{
    if( have_name( id ) )
    {
        client_print( 0 , print_chat, "Special user %s is comming to server!", gszName );
    }
}

have_name( id )
{
    new szName[32];
    get_user_name( id , szName, charsmax( szName ) );

    if( equali( szName , gszName ) )
        return true;
    return false;
}

[Napoleon_be]

Craxor, shouldn't you tag your function as a bool since you return true or false?

I think this will throw a warning on compilation.

[Craxor]

Originally Posted by Napoleon_be Craxor, shouldn't you tag your function as a bool since you return true or false? I think this will throw a warning on compilation.

No, you don't need

You could easilty test before make afirmations.

[Napoleon_be]

Yea i tested and you're right.

[OciXCrom]

Of course he should. It won't give an error, but since it returns a bool, it should be tagged as a bool.

[Craxor]

Originally Posted by OciXCrom Of course he should. It won't give an error, but since it returns a bool, it should be tagged as a bool.

I know that i should, but i fastly write because i not having so much free time in the last perioad so i didn't was fully-focused.

[OciXCrom]

You can also do return equali(szName, gszName) instead of true/false.

[Craxor]

Originally Posted by OciXCrom You can also do return equali(szName, gszName) instead of true/false.

Sounds cool, but i would like to let the topic-author understand what i'm doing there if is not unable the make a comparation with with equali() i don't believe over-complicated him with such small optimization will make him happy .