[SOLVED] Last Dev Builds are broken? [5105 @ Windows] - Page 2

fysiks · 03-19-2017 , 18:26 Re: [SOLVED] Last Dev Builds are broken? [5105 @ Windows]

ReHLDS shouldn't be supported for the same reason that non-Steam is not supported. It makes it a nightmare to support several different variations of the same game. I don't understand why ReHLDS is not properly shunned here. It's questionably legal to begin with.

Depresie · 03-19-2017 , 19:08 Re: [SOLVED] Last Dev Builds are broken? [5105 @ Windows]

@fysiks

Illegal or not, Valve won't bother, because it puts money in their pocket, indirectly, just like the non steam servers...

fysiks · *Last edited by fysiks; 03-19-2017 at 19:22.*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Depresie

@fysiks

Illegal or not, Valve won't bother, because it puts money in their pocket, indirectly, just like the non steam servers...

Non-Steam server provide no income to Valve. In fact, it is an opportunity cost that Valve pays for each an every illegal copy of a game. So, technically, they are losing money.

^SmileY · *Last edited by ^SmileY; 03-19-2017 at 19:37.*

Whell whell, non-stem or not fysiks, admins shoud decide it. Only support ReHLDS do not make the server non steam right?

EDITED: Forgot it, my fault :\

Depresie · 03-19-2017 , 19:35 Re: [SOLVED] Last Dev Builds are broken? [5105 @ Windows]

Open your eyes a little more...

Think how valve got so popular, and think why is the game still selling in 2017..

safetymoose · 03-22-2017 , 04:02 Re: [SOLVED] Last Dev Builds are broken? [5105 @ Windows]

@fysiks

ReHLDS and ReGameDLL are well within the rules of alliedmods. Both are open source projects, and neither support nonsteam or have nonsteam support built in. I dont see why they shouldn't get amxx support..

klippy · 03-22-2017 , 04:34 Re: [SOLVED] Last Dev Builds are broken? [5105 @ Windows]

Quote:

Originally Posted by safetymoose

@fysiks

ReHLDS and ReGameDLL are well within the rules of alliedmods. Both are open source projects, and neither support nonsteam or have nonsteam support built in. I dont see why they shouldn't get amxx support..

From Steam EULA:

Quote:

G. Restrictions on Use of Content and Services

You may not use the Content and Services for any purpose other than the permitted access to Steam and your Subscriptions, and to make personal, non-commercial use of your Subscriptions, except as otherwise permitted by this Agreement or applicable Subscription Terms. Except as otherwise permitted under this Agreement (including any Subscription Terms or Rules of Use), or under applicable law notwithstanding these restrictions, you may not, in whole or in part, copy, photocopy, reproduce, publish, distribute, translate, reverse engineer, derive source code from, modify, disassemble, decompile, create derivative works based on, or remove any proprietary notices or labels from the Content and Services or any software accessed via Steam without the prior consent, in writing, of Valve.

If I am understanding this paragraph right, it's illegal.
I think it's a cool project and I have nothing against it, even though I am not using it, but I see where Fysik's concern originates from.

^SmileY · *Last edited by ^SmileY; 03-22-2017 at 07:34.*

Jesus christ, i have a (SOLVED) problem with amxx dev. I do not want to discuss Re-HLDS.

But: create derivative works based on

Soo all amxx mods (Plugins) are illegal!1!!!1!1

Amxmodx is a simple (And pumped up) tool bro, do not matter if ReHLDS is illegal.

Also Content and Services

HLDS is not in this category i guess.

Anyway someone can close topic please, do not matter any opinion here, amxx team will never undo these changes..
IF someone think that is illegal, can use old builds to skip re-hlds support