[Chris-_-]

Only thing i can find from the models is the string "LOSER" to be a namecalling of these humiliation animations.

The only reasonable function i could find in IDA related to this name is CTFPlayerShared::IsLoser(void). Though that could be anything, as I know nothing

[Matthias Vance]

Have you tried loading the player model in a model viewer, and checking the animations?

Hmm, that function might actually be helpful! Someone should get a signature for it (or test it on linux) to check it out!

[Matthias Vance]

Originally Posted by Chris-_- From what i saw in IDA, there was another function called: CBaseEntity::GetTeamNumber, called before IsLoser, so i'm thinking that the IsLoser function applies to entire teams instead of per-client, would be cool to have a signature eitherway though

That's probably a loop through all players, checking if they are on the losing team, then calling CTFPlayer::IsLoser(), which is a PLAYER function.

[Chris-_-]

Does that exist? Checked?, or do you mean CTFPlayerShared::IsLoser()

[Matthias Vance]

CTFPlayerShared is probably inherited from CTFPlayer, so .. yes, I mean that function.

[Chris-_-]

Durrh, fine. Make signature nao!

[CrimsonGT]

You dont need the signature. For one, you cant do CTFPlayerShared calls with SDKCall, it requires MMS. Secondly, all it does is add a condition to the player, so figure out what the condition is and you can use this to add it.

http://forums.alliedmods.net/showthread.php?t=98542

[Jindo]

Well I adapted those stocks in to a plugin recently, I'll add it back to my server and experiment.

[Chris-_-]

Originally Posted by CrimsonGT You dont need the signature. For one, you cant do CTFPlayerShared calls with SDKCall, it requires MMS. Secondly, all it does is add a condition to the player, so figure out what the condition is and you can use this to add it. http://forums.alliedmods.net/showthread.php?t=98542

I recall you speaking of CTFPlayerShared in another thread about that, so i've had that in mind, though i'd totally be willing to have an MM:S plugin just to access that function. Also you were talking about the conditions in IRC for about 20 minutes ago and those who'd tested conditions were unable to "pull it off".

Hope someone figure this out

[CrimsonGT]

Yeah, apparently the assembly is doing something else with conditions. On second look, it looks like its actually checking for a condition rather than setting one.

Im messing around to see if I find anything else out about it.