[mplayerexe]

aham..
I will use bad camper instead

[joaquimandrade]

Originally Posted by mplayerexe i don`t understand this plugin slap ths campers ? i put it on my server and it does nothing to player`s who are camping ..

This plugin gives kisses in the cheeks of campers

[CuLLi]

big big big big request: can you made to show HP in that way at left side?

[bbthoms]

first of all i ve to say you have build a very useful and great plugin

but i ve one question:

its possible to change the color of the campers point on the radar? i ask because the most people think there are 2 bombs ^^... plz be so kind to explain me how i can change the color

besides you could install a text or something like that, which say for example "now you are visible on the enemys radar"???

i hope you will help me...

greetz

[joaquimandrade]

Originally Posted by CuLLi big big big big request: can you made to show HP in that way at left side?

You are asking to change the plugin to do that or to make you a plugin that just do that?

Originally Posted by bbthoms first of all i ve to say you have build a very useful and great plugin but i ve one question: its possible to change the color of the campers point on the radar? i ask because the most people think there are 2 bombs ^^... plz be so kind to explain me how i can change the color besides you could install a text or something like that, which say for example "now you are visible on the enemys radar"??? i hope you will help me... greetz

About the color, the only other solution (and i don't not guarantee that is possible but, i think so) would be to show the campers red to CT's and with the hostage blue color to T's. I will give it a try these days.

About the text I personally prefer to give advise to users in my server and let them spread the word to each others so I can have the screen clean of text but if you really think text is more suitable for you I will add it.

[CuLLi]

2nd.

But when i delete the HUD it will be working?

[bbthoms]

suuuper ...Many thanks!

[Brad]

This won't affect approval, but I have some suggestions for you:

• either use semicolons to end lines or don't
  • if you do, then add "#pragma semicolons 1" after the includes in your source to enforce your decision
• doesn't it bother you that you're using engine, FM, AND Ham when, in theory, you could probably just use one of the three?

Aside from my two suggestions/observations, the code seems fine and apparently works. Approved.

[joaquimandrade]

The gain is not relevant but:

PHP Code:

engfunc(Engfunc_CreateEntity,engfunc(EngFunc_AllocString,x)) 


has one more native call than

PHP Code:

create_entity(x) 


And

entity_set_* / entity_get_* have compile checks of the variable types and tags. What pev/set_pev can't have. So, why would I get rid of engine?

(Hamsandwich is essential and so is Fakemeta)

Edit:

Checking again, Fakemeta is not essential. But

PHP Code:

write_coord(floatround(origin[0]))
write_coord(floatround(origin[1]))
write_coord(floatround(origin[2])) 


is worst and uglier than:

PHP Code:

engfunc(EngFunc_WriteCoord,origin[0])
engfunc(EngFunc_WriteCoord,origin[1])
engfunc(EngFunc_WriteCoord,origin[1]) 


[Brad]

I've just always tried to limit the number of included modules to the least possible, as long as it was feasible. That's where I'm coming from.