HLG1.8 and AMXMODX 1.7

QuakerOates · **Author**

Any have problems getting these two to work?

I get the following:

Code:

07:49:17 [META] dll: Note: plugin '<hlguard_mm_optimized_i686.so>' is using an older interface version (5:10), not the latest interface version (5:13); there might be an updated version of the plugin
07:49:17 [HLGUARD] HLGuard 1.8 by The Z Project
07:49:17 [HLGUARD] http://www.thezproject.org/
07:49:17 [HLGUARD] Compiled: Jul 10 2005 21:35:03
07:49:17 [META] dll: Loaded plugin 'HLGuard': HLGuard v1.8 10/07/2005, The Z Project
07:49:17 [META] dll: Finished updating 12 plugins; kept 3, loaded 1, unloaded 1, reloaded 0, delayed 0

also used non-optimized hlg binary and same problem.

teame06 · 03-22-2006 , 02:57

Don't worry about it, It just mean that hlguard wasn't compiled against the newest metamod source code. The metamod plugin will still work fine with that warning.

QuakerOates · 03-22-2006 , 15:04

OK...thank you for your feedback

diamond-optic · 03-22-2006 , 20:31

yea i noticed that warning too..

but hlguard seems to be working fine for me..

QuakerOates · 03-23-2006 , 02:23

It was almost 2 weeks before a hlg ban showed up again on the amxbans page.
I think reloading the hlg binaries did something.
Have hlgsb option dissbled in hlg as its obselete and using latest sbsrv 2.5 but not sure how can i know show sbsrv bans on amxbans.

diamond-optic · 03-23-2006 , 12:07

? hlguard steambans option is obsolete? are you sure? i've still been getting steamban matches and bans over the past few days/week

QuakerOates · 03-23-2006 , 14:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by diamond-optic

? hlguard steambans option is obsolete? are you sure? i've still been getting steamban matches and bans over the past few days/week

It will ban..for sure...but you cant us SBHLG to record demos on the server as there is no fix applied to sbhlg to resolve Valve's STEAM_PENDING_ID issues that occured back in november.

**Brad** · 03-23-2006 , 14:49

Does this thread have anything to do with AMXX at this point?

Janet Jackson · 03-23-2006 , 17:24

Nope. Besides, it's already discussed here.