Raised This Month: $51 Target: $400
 12% 

suggestion


Post New Thread Reply   
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Author Message
Baron Rojo
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Old 01-27-2013 , 02:25   suggestion
Reply With Quote #1

* Is possibile to hardware ban cheaters to avoid then after they bought another steam account?

* There is a way to improve aimbot and antiwh effectivity?

Last week one guy with cheats (free one) come to our Smac protected server and he could use aimbot and see people even with anti_wallhack module on , Smac didn't caught him.

Smac on css was really Great but i feel that in cs go its not that effecttive , actually i Steel using it more for security protection (cmd block, spam connection, rcon secure) than for His main task caught Cheaters.

Thx and best regards if you need some feedback and some test i'm here

Last edited by Baron Rojo; 01-27-2013 at 02:29.
Baron Rojo is offline
Sheepdude
SourceMod Donor
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Chicago
Old 01-27-2013 , 03:19   Re: suggestion
Reply With Quote #2

Imo aimbot doesn't work at all, newer aimbot / toggle programs can simply operate without affecting it, and I have seen it multiple times on my server.

As for a "hardware" ban... that sounds interesting. I'm not too confident that something like that currently exists in the api, though.
__________________
Sheepdude is offline
pubhero
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Central Europe
Old 01-27-2013 , 05:27   Re: suggestion
Reply With Quote #3

Baron Rojo.
Aimboters on a latest SMAC protected server? Hmmm.

Sheepdude.
I think he talking about the MAC adress based ban. Or not?

Last edited by pubhero; 01-27-2013 at 05:28.
pubhero is offline
Baron Rojo
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Old 01-27-2013 , 08:48   Re: suggestion
Reply With Quote #4

Hi for hardware ban i mean any possibile mode to identify and ban the computer of the banned person it could be hdd serial , Mac addres ban , dunno if Smac have access to this info, know other anticheats can make hardware bans.
Baron Rojo is offline
ecca
Sexy Santa
Join Date: Jan 2011
Old 01-27-2013 , 09:20   Re: suggestion
Reply With Quote #5

It's not possible to get a players hardware info without an .exe program, thank god for that.
ecca is offline
pubhero
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Central Europe
Old 01-27-2013 , 12:06   Re: suggestion
Reply With Quote #6

And no other method for marked that machine, like "hey. this pc was banned from here".
I mean some sm plugin can't writing a specific row into the clients cfg?

Last edited by pubhero; 01-27-2013 at 12:09.
pubhero is offline
Dr. McKay
Sir Dr. SourceMod Plugin Approver Esq. Ltd. M.D. PhD
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlantis
Old 01-27-2013 , 22:04   suggestion
Reply With Quote #7

Quote:
Originally Posted by pubhero View Post
And no other method for marked that machine, like "hey. this pc was banned from here".
I mean some sm plugin can't writing a specific row into the clients cfg?
No, you can get a client's hardware info. As for writing a line to the client's config, that's called slowhacking and is not allowed here

Just stick with Steam ID and IP bans.
__________________
Dr. McKay is offline
Baron Rojo
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Old 01-28-2013 , 05:19   Re: suggestion
Reply With Quote #8

And block macadress is possible? IP ban is not that usefull most user have dynamic Ip, steam account is the most usefull ban at the moment but it looks like valve instead of making the game unfriendly to cheaters they make it more viable selling cs go at 5 dollars -.-.

--

Other thing is viable to make download from your server an lite .exec ac that communicate with smac? then the user that want to play on your server should start it , this is only for guarantee the fair play.

I say this because recently when I say that we have an anticheat people laugh, smac doesnot inspire respect as it did before, i'm trying to contribute with some ideas to improve it effectiveness

Last edited by Baron Rojo; 01-28-2013 at 05:31.
Baron Rojo is offline
checkster
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Norway
Old 01-28-2013 , 12:21   Re: suggestion
Reply With Quote #9

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron Rojo View Post
Other thing is viable to make download from your server an lite .exec ac that communicate with smac? then the user that want to play on your server should start it , this is only for guarantee the fair play.
Still slowhacking, did you not read mcays post ?
checkster is offline
Baron Rojo
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Old 01-28-2013 , 16:10   Re: suggestion
Reply With Quote #10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron Rojo View Post
then the user that want to play on your server should start it
Did you not read this line?

How it will be hacking if the client accept the conditions and they start it?

Anyways is just an idea.
Baron Rojo is offline
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:50.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Theme made by Freecode