[KissLick]

throw

We are going to have exceptions in sp? :-O

[asherkin]

Originally Posted by KissLick throw We are going to have exceptions in sp? :-O

The point is to landgrab everything to avoid more breaking changes in the future, none of them mean anything at the moment.

[Mathias.]

you plan to actually add real variables type and size?

[BAILOPAN]

I plan to steal every keyword I reasonably can so I can add features well into the future without breaking stuff ;)

[Wliu]

try|catch sounds really really nice .

[Chdata]

throw frog;
return Success;

[Powerlord]

So, apparently the 1.7 compiler is choking on dhooks.inc, particularly these lines:

funcenum DHookCallback
{
	//Function Example: void Ham::Test() with this pointer ignore
	MRESReturn:public(),
	
	//Function Example: void Ham::Test() with this pointer passed
	MRESReturn:public(this),
	
	//Function Example: void Ham::Test(int cake) with this pointer ignore
	MRESReturn:public(Handle:hParams),
	
	//Function Example: void Ham::Test(int cake) with this pointer passed
	MRESReturn:public(this, Handle:hParams),
	
	//Function Example: int Ham::Test() with this pointer ignore
	MRESReturn:public(Handle:hReturn),
	
	//Function Example: int Ham::Test() with this pointer passed
	MRESReturn:public(this, Handle:hReturn),
	
	//Function Example: int Ham::Test(int cake) with this pointer ignore
	MRESReturn:public(Handle:hReturn, Handle:hParams),
	
	//Function Example: int Ham::Test(int cake) with this pointer passed
	MRESReturn:public(this, Handle:hReturn, Handle:hParams),
	
	//Address NOW
	
	//Function Example: void Ham::Test() with this pointer passed
	MRESReturn:public(Address:this),
	
	//Function Example: void Ham::Test(int cake) with this pointer passed
	MRESReturn:public(Address:this, Handle:hParams),
	
	//Function Example: int Ham::Test() with this pointer passed
	MRESReturn:public(Address:this, Handle:hReturn),
	
	//Function Example: int Ham::Test(int cake) with this pointer passed
	MRESReturn:public(Address:this, Handle:hReturn, Handle:hParams)
	
};

It seems to not like the "this" in these declarations as all the ones that have an arg named "this" are bombing with these types of messages:

C:\Projects\SourceMod\notepad++\sourcepawn.co mpiler\include\dhooks.inc(99) : error 010: invalid function or declaration

I know we're adding new keywords, but it's a Bad Thing (tm) to break existing code while doing that.

[ehha]

Originally Posted by BAILOPAN I plan to steal every keyword I reasonably can so I can add features well into the future without breaking stuff ;)

Steal all the things!
http://www.dotnetperls.com/keyword

[Mathias.]

Powerlord, you can change "this" by any other name and it will work, I highly doubt that 1.7 and above will allow any plugins to reserve the keyword "this" since it will become (already is in 1.7) a main feature.

[nergal]

Originally Posted by Black-Rabbit Powerlord, you can change "this" by any other name and it will work, I highly doubt that 1.7 and above will allow any plugins to reserve the keyword "this" since it will become (already is in 1.7) a main feature.

what about "Self" ? Not that it matters but asking out of curiosity unless curiosity will kill your avatar :>