[klippy]

You can do #include <dicksout.forharambe> if you so desire, extension means absolutely nothing to the compiler. .inl is the extension someone around these forums used once (I remember Diablo II mod used it) and suddenly people think it's some standard thing.

I don't see anything wrong in the picture you posted.

[HamletEagle]

You can include any text file, compiler does not care about extension.

[addons_zz]

Originally Posted by icimaro1337 Do I can include .sma files like #include <file.sma> as <file.inl>? didn't tested, but i think this won't work... Also found one more mistake, can't explain, but here pic

I tried to implement it on my theme, it is impossible to do it on Sublime Text.



Here you may see why: https://forum.sublimetext.com/t/how-...e-syntax/22392

Originally Posted by addons_zz this is because sublime can only run against the current line, but how to properly overcome it on this situation?

Originally Posted by FichteFoll There is no sane way to match the last register_cvar call where the opening parens only come after another 4 lines or even just the next line (looks horrendous anyway), so my recommendation is to just not do it.

[Depresie]

This is getting ridiculous, a bunch of programmers around here, yet we still have to resort to this kind of things instead of creating a new editor for amxx/sourcemod... just saying, don't kill me lol

[fysiks]

Originally Posted by Depresie This is getting ridiculous, a bunch of programmers around here, yet we still have to resort to this kind of things instead of creating a new editor for amxx/sourcemod... just saying, don't kill me lol

Creating a new editor solely for AMX Mod X and SourceMod is a horrible idea (hence why AMXX Studio has failed and Arkshine stopped development of his Notepad++ fork).

The proper solution is to extend the current functionality of existing source code editors (preferably the one that you like best) because AMX Mod X and SourceMod are still just text-based languages that are extremely similar to other languages. I.e. there is nothing that AMX Mod X and SourceMod have that require any extremely special functionality.

If an existing source code editor is unable to accommodate custom languages then it's probably not a good general purpose source code editor. Personally, I've never needed more functionality from Notepad++ than I could add using the existing extendability features (user-defined languages, plugins, etc.).

[addons_zz]

Originally Posted by Depresie This is getting ridiculous, a bunch of programmers around here, yet we still have to resort to this kind of things instead of creating a new editor for amxx/sourcemod... just saying, don't kill me lol

Actually I was probably wrong, that thing should be possible, just not using a syntax file, but creating a Sublime Package (plugin/add-ons/add-in) to do the match apply the syntax.

Ok, tell us what do you need from a editor.
So, if it does not do it yet , It may be extended on Sublime Text within a package.

I liked Sublime because it is very portable and handy with its project, workspaces (switch project/workspace) and builds, with its settings and packages across Linux/Mac/Windows.
It is just not good to perform some operations as notepad++ is, hence on these cases I just launch Notepad++ do it and came back or just use both at same time.

[icimaro1337]

Hi again!
Here is code

PHP Code:

enum _:PLAYER_DATA
{
    Float:vCheckPointOrigin[3]
}
new g_ePlayerData[MAX_PLAYERS][PLAYER_DATA]; 


Here img, is it possible to cut this [3] from autocomplete?

[icimaro1337]

wrong msg... sry

[Destro-]

Update 2.0

- Bugs fixed - News colors scheme! ( atomic / twlight / npp) - Auto-increment version/build (formar: [v]{major}.{minor}.{build/revision-build}[b[eta]]) same that

[Depresie]

You forgot to change the ver no above dwn link