[ArtAttack]

good luck

[ibm86]

Aaaaaaaaaargh! I can't the damn freakin' metamodx to compile !

[BAILOPAN]

Make sure you are using the hlsdk in the CVS.

[ibm86]

ifeq "$(OS)" "linux"
    PATH_WIN=/usr/local/cross-tools/i586-mingw32msvc/bin
    SDKTOP=$(HOME)/amxmodx/hldsk/
    INST_DIR=$(HOME)/half-life/cstrike/dlls
    TEST_DIR=$(HOME)/test/tfc/dlls
    TST_DIR=$(HOME)/tmp
else    ## windows
    PATH_WIN=/gcc-2.95.2-msvcrt/bin
    SDKTOP=/hlsdk2.3
    INST_DIR=/hlserver/tfc/dlls
    TEST_DIR=/hlserver/tfc/dlls
endif

DLLS_DIR=../dlls
SDKSRC=$(SDKTOP)/SourceCode
METADIR=../metamod

not working mate

[xeroblood]

Originally Posted by Johnny got his gun About multidimensional arrays... Those are just an abstraction, you could implement a 5x5x5 array using a 125-sized array, and a proper interface for the array. and IMO I think the loose indentation warnings should stay. Lots of nasty stuff is avoided this way. I see it as a good feature. Makes you learn how to indent properly :-)

Yeah, using the proper math you could do (i*size)+j for a 3 dim array for example, but I was wondering if it would be added so our code doesn't look so messy.. thats all, if not, no big deal, as there are ways around it, but X-Dimensional arrays are nice feature...

And also, loose indentation is pointless, I know how to code nicely, and with conventions and all, but they're freaking annoying, and entirely not needed.. I personally like writing my code like:
public SomeFunction()
{ // first line of code here...
// second line of code here..
}

but Small compiler doesn't like that.. it doesn't like my first line of code being on same line as {.. but it really doesn't matter..

Anyway.. there are always work arounds, I just thought, if it is being remade, why not add some nice features at least support for 3Dim arrays..

[DopeFish]

Originally Posted by ibm86 not working mate

metamodx compiles fine, just edit the Makefile to reflect your enviroment.

[CheesyPeteza]

Originally Posted by Scarzzurs I've never seen a situation where ppl would need more then 2 diminsional arrays. Some ppl say: "But what if i want to store multiple strings for each client, Fx.: newstring[33][10][]" But even that is easy to fix: new strings[10][] new players[33][10] where you redirect to the other array.... Scarzzurs Btw. i didn't say that it wasn't possible, but i have just not seen a situation where there wasn't a well functional workaround....

Thats not a 3 dimensional array though. You still only have one strings array. If it was 3 dimensional you'd have 33 different strings arrays.

I have used JGHG method for doing 3 dimensional arrays, but its not a tidy and simple way of doing things, it does work though. After writing one plugin using this method, I think I'd probably just do the next one for metamod so I could use c++.

If 3 dimensional arrays were added I'd be very happy, but I don't expect it.

[BAILOPAN]

Glibc2.2 compile machines are back online!

Back to work

[MagicShot]

Yay!!

Get to It... Chop Chop... hehe

[ArtAttack]

nice