Raised This Month: $51 Target: $400
 12% 

Steganography, kinda pointless but curious thread.


Post New Thread Reply   
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
TheNewt
Donor
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I live.
Old 07-24-2007 , 17:05   Re: Steganography, kinda pointless but curious thread.
Reply With Quote #11


Indeed it is. CRACK THE CODE
__________________
Quote:
toe3_ left the chat room. (G-lined (AUTO Excessive connections from a single host.))
TheNewt is offline
TheNewt
Donor
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I live.
Old 07-24-2007 , 17:42   Re: Steganography, kinda pointless but curious thread.
Reply With Quote #12

Wow, read up on it. This paragraph was interesting.
Quote:
A difference of one or two in the intensities is imperceptible, and, in fact, a digitized picture can still look good if the least significant four bits of intensity are altered -- a change of up to 16 in the color's value. This gives plenty of space to hide a secret message. Text is usually stored with 8 bits per letter, so we could hide 1.5 letters in each pixel of the cover photo. A 640x480 pixel image, the size of a small computer monitor, can hold over 400,000 characters. That's a whole novel hidden in one modest photo!
That last bit reminds me of the saying "A picture is worth a thousand words". And I'm starting to think, damn right.
__________________
Quote:
toe3_ left the chat room. (G-lined (AUTO Excessive connections from a single host.))
TheNewt is offline
Roach
Writes love letters to sawce Daily
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Internet
Old 07-24-2007 , 23:07   Re: Steganography, kinda pointless but curious thread.
Reply With Quote #13

Um...your "cool" insert is made of fail. It has no file extension designating the type of file it is.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad View Post
That sounds like a really good idea!
Now replace the word "good" with "dumb".
What was your rationale for proposing such a thing?
Roach is offline
stupok
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Old 07-25-2007 , 01:09   Re: Steganography, kinda pointless but curious thread.
Reply With Quote #14

lolz, http://xkcd.com/54/

This is pretty incredible :O
stupok is offline
nick123
BANNED
Join Date: Dec 2006
Old 07-25-2007 , 06:26   Re: Steganography, kinda pointless but curious thread.
Reply With Quote #15

im too dumb for this shit, tried installing it and working it but i phailed. uninstall
nick123 is offline
Pro Patria Finland
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: BaronPub.com
Old 07-25-2007 , 07:00   Re: Steganography, kinda pointless but curious thread.
Reply With Quote #16

README.txt FTW!
__________________
I am not a number. I am Gordon Freeman!
Pro Patria Finland is offline
Roach
Writes love letters to sawce Daily
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Internet
Old 07-25-2007 , 11:50   Re: Steganography, kinda pointless but curious thread.
Reply With Quote #17

Quote:
Originally Posted by stupok69 View Post
lolz, http://xkcd.com/54/

This is pretty incredible :O
Hark, he found the image!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad View Post
That sounds like a really good idea!
Now replace the word "good" with "dumb".
What was your rationale for proposing such a thing?
Roach is offline
stupok
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Old 07-25-2007 , 12:13   Re: Steganography, kinda pointless but curious thread.
Reply With Quote #18

I'm not sure I really understand how steganography works... the file seems to be the same size after you embed stuff into it.

Is it actually the same size? or is the size just not recognized properly?

Also, I used PCopy to put a directory into an image, but after extracting the directory some of the image files inside were merged together and saved as a mutant file. Weird...
stupok is offline
Lee
AlliedModders Donor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Old 07-25-2007 , 14:08   Re: Steganography, kinda pointless but curious thread.
Reply With Quote #19

It is the same size, yes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stegano...odern_practice

Last edited by Lee; 07-25-2007 at 14:14.
Lee is offline
TheNewt
Donor
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I live.
Old 07-26-2007 , 00:30   Re: Steganography, kinda pointless but curious thread.
Reply With Quote #20

Quote:
Um...your "cool" insert is made of fail. It has no file extension designating the type of file it is.
Your kidding me right? I thought that would be the easy part. Add some file extensions, you'll figure it out. Trust meh.

Quote:
I'm not sure I really understand how steganography works... the file seems to be the same size after you embed stuff into it.

Is it actually the same size? or is the size just not recognized properly?
Thats the beauty of steganography. It replaces bits near white noise in pictures and sound files, so that its unnoticeable by the naked eye or ear, and since it actually replaces bits it will be the exact same size as the original picture or sound. That just makes it that much more cool
__________________
Quote:
toe3_ left the chat room. (G-lined (AUTO Excessive connections from a single host.))
TheNewt is offline
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Theme made by Freecode