[Arkshine]

My plugin is difficult ?!

- Save all maps in an array
- Pickup randomly x maps ( checking if it's not the current map/ map already pickup )
- Destroy the array.

That's all... Hu. It's more optimized and well-coded.

[DA]

Originally Posted by arkshine My plugin is difficult ?! - Save all maps in an array - Pickup randomly x maps ( checking if it's not the current map/ map already pickup ) - Destroy the array. That's all... Hu. It's more optimized and well-coded.

Well, yours is difficult but if I can use mine, then I use mine because I know this is mine.
Yours is well-coded - yes but it's not more optimized. It do the same thing with different methods.

I hope you don't misunderstand me. I'm really happy and thankfully about your work. But I don't want that you give me the complete code so that I learn nothing.

[Arkshine]

it's not more optimized. It do the same thing with different methods.

I can't agree.

It's better to use fopen, fgets, etc.. ( c++ like ) instead of read_file() in such situation. ( see the source of this native and you will understand ).
I'm using dynamic array to avoid to have a defined map limit ( so no need to edit the .sma ) and saving memory since the array is destroyed at the end.

It's just more efficient & optimized.

[DA]

Originally Posted by arkshine I can't agree. It's better to use fopen, fgets, etc.. ( c++ like ) instead of read_file() in such situation. ( see the source of this native and you will understand ). I'm using dynamic array to avoid to have a defined map limit ( so no need to edit the .sma ) and saving memory since the array is destroyed at the end. It's just more efficient & optimized.

If you had read my function then you know that the most of that is included in it.

Well, I finally get every time the same warning. Now I think it is the best when I post the complete plugin. I hope someone can help me then better. Thanks

[Arkshine]

If you had read my function then you know that the most of that is included in it.

Most ? ... Uhuh. What are you talking ?! You don't use dynamic array nor the new file native... Have you take a look into the source of read_file() at least ?!

I think you don't want to understand. You're wrong but whatever, I give up. It seems that I'm not enough good to explain well in english.

You say that you want to learn, but you ignore that I say, so, eh, good luck.

[DA]

Originally Posted by arkshine Most ? ... Uhuh. What are you talking ?! You don't use dynamic array nor the new file native... Have you take a look into the source of read_file() at least ?! I think you don't want to understand. You're wrong but whatever, I give up. It seems that I'm not enough good to explain well in english. You say that you want to learn, but you ignore that I say, so, eh, good luck.

Okay, sorry. I was a little bit tired yesterdy. It's my fault.
It's okay if you want no more help me.

[Arkshine]

It's okay if you want no more help me.

I can't help you, because I don't see the purpose to help you with such of bad code. I mean, what you have done is, for me, a bad way. That's why I give you a full example using the dynamic array and the new file native, which are better for such case.

Also, there is another way. Instead of saving all maps, you can search the character '^n' which means 'new line'. It stays at the end of each line. eg : for the fourth map, you have to search le fourth '^n' in the file ( fseek() ). After that, using fread_blocks() or fgets() to retrieve the string before this character.
But as the first method, you have to read all the datas into the file.

That's why, what I've done is fine, easier and more safer.