[FunkyLoveCow]

Your config is set at 4 detections for aimbotting.

smac_aimbot_ban "4"

The hacker would have to be detected two more times before any action is taken.

[TwOzCaR]

Originally Posted by FunkyLoveCow Your config is set at 4 detections for aimbotting. smac_aimbot_ban "4" The hacker would have to be detected two more times before any action is taken.

by the way you cant set it too below 4 detections before ban (actually it takes 5 detections before ban because first detection is silent due to possibility of false detection)

if you need it to ban on lets see 2 detections you need to edit the .sp and recompile it

[Mike_BoG]

What is the recommended value for that cvar then?

[TwOzCaR]

you need to edit the aimbot.sp file and recompile the sourcemod plugin. it is sat to 45o which is way to underpowered, maybe a 25 angle would be better

find in -> sourcemod/scripting/smac/aimbot.sp

[SaintK]

Originally Posted by TwOzCaR you need to edit the aimbot.sp file and recompile the sourcemod plugin. it is sat to 45o which is way to underpowered, maybe a 25 angle would be better find in -> sourcemod/scripting/smac/aimbot.sp

This is confirmed too low. It triggered multiple detects on a client playing heavy having no aimbot.

L 08/11/2011 - 21:183: [SpA]Gibboss28 (ID: STEAM_0:1:13 | IP: 82.18.) is suspected of using an aimbot. (Detection #2) (Deviation: 31°)

[TwOzCaR]

Originally Posted by SaintK This is confirmed too low. It triggered multiple detects on a client playing heavy having no aimbot.

there are 2 lines of interest which is good tampering with

line 26: #define AIM_ANGLE_CHANGE 15.0 // Max angle change that a player should snap

line 251: if (fAngleDiff > 45)
fAngleDiff = (fAngleDiff - 90) * -1;

my settings at the moment ^ but u say 25 is too low set? is that confirmed or just a thought?

[SaintK]

Originally Posted by TwOzCaR there are 2 lines of interest which is good tampering with line 26: #define AIM_ANGLE_CHANGE 15.0 // Max angle change that a player should snap line 251: if (fAngleDiff > 45) fAngleDiff = (fAngleDiff - 90) * -1; my settings at the moment ^ but u say 25 is too low set? is that confirmed or just a thought?

I only changed the 45.0 value to 25.0 - and that is definitely, confirmed to low. It had "Deviation: 31°" where that client is 100% clean.

[TwOzCaR]

Originally Posted by SaintK I only changed the 45.0 value to 25.0 - and that is definitely, confirmed to low. It had "Deviation: 31°" where that client is 100% clean.

maybe a deviation at 32° is better then?

[GoD-Tony]

Originally Posted by TwOzCaR line 251: if (fAngleDiff > 45) fAngleDiff = (fAngleDiff - 90) * -1;

Whoa, this part shouldn't be changed at all. It's there because of the way that the angles need to be calculated.

/*
    Using these values as an example:
    vLastAngles = -179
    vAngles = 170
*/

/*
    GetVectorDistance() will return 349 in this case,
    but the player didn't do such a large spin.
*/
fAngleDiff = GetVectorDistance(vLastAngles, vAngles);

// The max a player could snap is 180, and the above case is accounted for here.
if (fAngleDiff > 180)
    fAngleDiff = (fAngleDiff - 360) * -1;
    
// Player snapped 11 degrees.

I probably should have commented the code as I went along, but this went from a small test case to SMAC pretty quickly.

[TwOzCaR]

Originally Posted by GoD-Tony Whoa, this part shouldn't be changed at all. It's there because of the way that the angles need to be calculated. Code: /*     Using these values as an example:     vLastAngles = -179     vAngles = 170 */ /*     GetVectorDistance( ) will return 349 in this case,     but the player didn't do such a large spin. */ fAngleDiff = GetVectorDistance(vLastAngles, vAngles); // The max a player could snap is 180, and the above case is accounted for here. if (fAngleDiff > 180)     fAngleDiff = (fAngleDiff - 360) * -1;      // Player snapped 11 degrees. I probably should have commented the code as I went along, but this went from a small test case to SMAC pretty quickly.

hehe =) but i was desperate and wanted the aimbot detection to be more aggressive but i change it back then,

but its funny as i aint got one false detection yet, but ok its an war server, so the player amount is not that big