[Pelipoika]

You can turn the chat spam off in the Free & Donor version of LMAOBOX, the latter of which it is disabled in by default

[m4ster]

Originally Posted by Potato Uno Any troll who types is an asshole you most likely do not want in your server, so IMO that should be caught in the crossfire anyway (even if the blacklisted message is a substring). These people deserve to be banned off the server (my personal opinion).

The purpose of this plugin isn't to ban assholes. Admins install this to their servers to ban chat spammers included in some cheats. I must agree that the detection mechanism included in this plugin is poorly designed and can cause a lot of false positives.

[Aderic]

Originally Posted by Pelipoika You can turn the chat spam off in the Free & Donor version of LMAOBOX, the latter of which it is disabled in by default

The free version.. if you uncheck it.. it still spams.

Originally Posted by m4ster The purpose of this plugin isn't to ban assholes. Admins install this to their servers to ban chat spammers included in some cheats. I must agree that the detection mechanism included in this plugin is poorly designed and can cause a lot of false positives.

Not if you have it set to 1; if you've even tried the newest release it now CAN take multiple detections to ban.

Originally Posted by Phaiz Fortunately there are those of us out there who don't think unjustified bans are fair or warranted, plus they're just bad business for any community that wants to grow and not be known as ban happy. With this logic we may as well ban someone just for saying the word "aimbot". Take a look at nearly any other program that bans without admin input.. most of them require multiple detections thus eliminating the chance of a false positive.

No, because the word "aimbot" is nothing like saying "WWW.LMAOBOX.NET - BEST FREE TF2 HACK!" if left on 1..

and it's also nothing like saying the exact bot URL LMAOBOX.NET even if it was set to 2.

You're stretching the logic.

[ygor.almeida]

Originally Posted by KorDen Better use GetFeatureStatus(FeatureType_Native, "SBBanPlayer") == FeatureStatus_Available than all that checks... Attached better SB integration (Will not compile on forum, so attached compiled version)

Version 1.4 does not work on my SourceBans, the version of Korden, works well, but would like the new phrases, someone could compile for me ??? Or tell me why not work? The version of my SourceBans 1.5.2F-dev-git165

Could you help me?

[ygor.almeida]

still no answer !?

No logs ... it does not show anything, and the version of korden i cannot make it detect with new phrases.

Anyclue or help ?

[Aderic]

Originally Posted by ygor.almeida still no answer !? No logs ... it does not show anything, and the version of korden i cannot make it detect with new phrases. Anyclue or help ?

I'm not understanding the issue.

The plugin is failing to load or just not working?

[ygor.almeida]

Originally Posted by Aderic I'm not understanding the issue. The plugin is failing to load or just not working?

Just not working....

[Aderic]

Originally Posted by ygor.almeida Just not working....

Add me on Steam and we can discuss the situation.

[Horsedick]

I'm running this and I had a regular say this line which executed a ban but it did so thru Source and basically SourceBans didn't pick up on it at all. Had to use a removeid to clear it.

[Aderic]

Originally Posted by Horsedick I'm running this and I had a regular say this line which executed a ban but it did so thru Source and basically SourceBans didn't pick up on it at all. Had to use a removeid to clear it.

Hmm, I'll look into this.

Can you provide me with your SourceBans version?