[Ade]

I started using it and it got me as I spawned:

... is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 0 270 0

but i think i will keep it for the 'old commands' thingy if you guys say they're legit

[(-CAF-) Bobbo!]

Hello; I know you guys get sick of seeing these things posted; I try not to post them a lot. Anyway, A regular to one of my servers was very sure a player was hacking. This player argued with me, I was thrown in the middle. I checked SMAC and sure enough:

L 07/24/2013 - 19:55:56: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill (ID) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 359 104 0 L 07/24/2013 - 19:56:54: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill (I) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 354 167 0 L 07/24/2013 - 19:578: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 0 270 0 L 07/24/2013 - 19:57:44: [smac_aimbot.smx] Bill (I: ) is suspected of using an aimbot. (Detection #2 | Deviation: 149° | Weapon: tf_weapon_sniperrifle) L 07/24/2013 - 19:58:00 [smac_aimbot.smx] Bill (I: ) is suspected of using an aimbot. (Detection #3 | Deviation: 148° | Weapon: tf_weapon_sniperrifle) L 07/24/2013 - 20:05:06: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 358 100 0 L 07/24/2013 - 20:056: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 349 22 0 L 07/24/2013 - 20:06:20: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 358 100 0 L 07/24/2013 - 20:07:01: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 349 146 0 L 07/24/2013 - 20:07:49: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 340 23 0 L 07/26/2013 - 03:08:41: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LLT sniper (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 354 196 0 L 07/26/2013 - 03:09:43: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 358 173 0 L 07/26/2013 - 03:10:46: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 3 296 0 L 07/26/2013 - 03:12:18: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 14 328 0 L 07/26/2013 - 03:13:16: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 328 299 0 L 07/26/2013 - 03:14:09: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 3 288 0 L 07/26/2013 - 03:57:45: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 348 147 0 L 07/26/2013 - 03:58:03: [smac_aimbot.smx] Bill LFT sniper (ID ) is suspected of using an aimbot. (Detection #2 | Deviation: 147° | Weapon: tf_weapon_scattergun) L 07/26/2013 - 03:58:49: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 3 276 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:001: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 359 279 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:02:09: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 4 300 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:02:23: [smac_aimbot.smx] Bill LFT sniper (ID ) is suspected of using an aimbot. (Detection #3 | Deviation: 146° | Weapon: tf_weapon_scattergun) L 07/26/2013 - 04:03:12: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 304 105 -3 L 07/26/2013 - 04:049: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 2 270 -2 L 07/26/2013 - 04:06:24: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 0 270 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:06:29: [smac_aimbot.smx] Bill LFT sniper (ID ) is suspected of using an aimbot. (Detection #4 | Deviation: 146° | Weapon: tf_weapon_sniperrifle) L 07/26/2013 - 04:08:59: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 0 297 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:09:10: [smac_aimbot.smx] Bill LFT sniper (ID ) is suspected of using an aimbot. (Detection #3 | Deviation: 149° | Weapon: tf_weapon_sniperrifle) L 07/26/2013 - 04:09:44: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 0 285 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:10:21: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 347 239 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:11:49: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 0 293 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:12:28: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 358 233 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:13:00: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 0 297 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:13:08: [smac_aimbot.smx] Bill LFT sniper (ID ) is suspected of using an aimbot. (Detection #3 | Deviation: 149° | Weapon: tf_weapon_sniperrifle) L 07/26/2013 - 04:134: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 359 320 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:14:07: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 2 359 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:15:10: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 359 179 0 L 07/26/2013 - 04:15:10: [smac_aimbot.smx] Bill LFT sniper (ID ) is suspected of using an aimbot. (Detection #4 | Deviation: 147° | Weapon: tf_weapon_sniperrifle) L 07/26/2013 - 04:16:05: [smac_eyetest.smx] Bill LFT sniper (I: ) is suspected of cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 358 265 0

Now, I know they are old, but I want to make sure I did right by the numbers here and that this player is indeed a dirty hacker and I should have him banned, so can someone verify that these numbers are that of a dirty no good hacker?


(Btw, yes I did set it to autoban now... and the hell with these smilies...! )

[allienaded]

Originally Posted by (-CAF-) Bobbo! --

Simply the amount of aimbot detections clearly show's he was hacking, no need to verify such obvious things.. Just set everything (exept the Command Monitor) to auto ban and if someone complains for getting banned check the logs and then only if you're fairly sure the ban was incorrect post here though the eye angle and aimbot detections are practically never wrong. Personally I also use SMACBans (set to kick known cheaters) and VAC Status Checker (also set to kick) on top of SMAC with all 3 global banlists (EAC, ESEA, KAC).

EDIT: I no longer use the ESEA ban list after recent events where ESEA wrongfully banned people for "Payment Fraud" because they reversed extra payments they shouldn't have gotten in the first place. Overall after the bitcoin fiasco I've lost trust in ESEA.

[Cerobug]

I have a reg on our server who got banned twice for eye angles and my superiors want me to make sure they are legit.

L 10/21/2013 - 16:13:44: [smac_eyetest.smx | 0.8.5.0] Disturbed (ID: STEAM_0:1: | IP: ) was banned for cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 346 184 0
Map: dod_jagd | Origin: -291 -963 -347 | Angles: -8 -173 0 | Weapon: weapon_k98 | Team: 3 | Latency: 74ms

L 10/16/2013 - 19:20:01: [smac_eyetest.smx | 0.8.5.0] Disturbed (ID: STEAM_0:1: | IP: ) was banned for cheating with their eye angles. Eye Angles: 359 251 0
Map: dod_colmar | Origin: 287 1109 2 | Angles: -0 -108 0 | Weapon: weapon_k98_scoped | Team: 3 | Latency: 72ms

[(-CAF-) Bobbo!]

Originally Posted by allienaded Simply the amount of aimbot detections clearly show's he was hacking, no need to verify such obvious things.. Just set everything (exept the Command Monitor) to auto ban and if someone complains for getting banned check the logs and then only if you're fairly sure the ban was incorrect post here though the eye angle and aimbot detections are practically never wrong. Personally I also use SMACBans (set to kick known cheaters) and VAC Status Checker (also set to kick) on top of SMAC with all 3 global banlists (EAC, ESEA, KAC).

Thank you for the advice, will def. Do!


As far as the numbers, the only reason I was looking for verification, was due to his connections with a UGC scrim team. I am still curious.

[m4ster]

Originally Posted by (-CAF-) Bobbo! Thank you for the advice, will def. Do!

It isn't fair to kick somebody who was VACed for playing mods in call of duty.

[Ade]

696 servers with that plugin disagree

[allienaded]

Originally Posted by m4ster It isn't fair to kick somebody who was VACed for playing mods in call of duty.

If you're sure someone got VACed for something such as an FPS unlocker in cod you can always whitelist them on the status detector or simply not use the plugin (or set it to log only). Server admins have the right to prevent anyone joining their server for any reason, community run servers are a privlidge not something you should take for granted. At the end of the day the owner either directly or indirectly (electricity, internet connection) pays for your right to play on his server.

[HSFighter]

Hi all,

can someone tell me if "CmdNum: 189 PrevCmdNum: 22245 | [36761:36762:36766]" is a valid ban?

Thanks for the effort.


-

[psychonic]

Originally Posted by HSFighter Hi all, can someone tell me if "CmdNum: 189 PrevCmdNum: 22245 | [3676167626766]" is a valid ban? Thanks for the effort. -

It is.