Raised This Month: $12 Target: $400
 3% 

Why do CSS:DM still requires a extension?


Post New Thread Reply   
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Author Message
klausenbusk
AlliedModders Donor
Join Date: Jan 2011
Old 03-06-2012 , 12:58   Why do CSS:DM still requires a extension?
Reply With Quote #1

Hello people

Do any of you know why CSS:DM still require a extension? Because i can't see why it need it anymore.
Maybe bailopan just not have got time to it yet? :)

Last edited by klausenbusk; 03-06-2012 at 12:58.
klausenbusk is offline
Peace-Maker
SourceMod Plugin Approver
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Germany
Old 03-07-2012 , 17:42   Re: Why do CSS:DM still requires a extension?
Reply With Quote #2

Because of FFA.
__________________
Peace-Maker is offline
klausenbusk
AlliedModders Donor
Join Date: Jan 2011
Old 03-08-2012 , 02:34   Re: Why do CSS:DM still requires a extension?
Reply With Quote #3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peace-Maker View Post
Because of FFA.
Why do all the other code still require the extension, when many of the function cssdm extension provide is now included in sourcemod?
And Free For all can be doing with "[CS:S] Free For All" and sdkhooks.

Last edited by klausenbusk; 03-08-2012 at 02:36.
klausenbusk is offline
Dr!fter
The Salt Boss
Join Date: Mar 2007
Old 03-08-2012 , 12:04   Re: Why do CSS:DM still requires a extension?
Reply With Quote #4

Most of it can be done in source pawn. FFA does require it the plugin does most of the stuff but not all. The extension actually allows domination and revenge to work for same team and a few other things that I can't remember now. Once the load to address stuff is fixed the extension wouldn't be needed at all. But I don't see an issue with the extension. At some point gamedata might be added to autoupdater. Also sdkhooks is an extension so :p
Dr!fter is offline
klausenbusk
AlliedModders Donor
Join Date: Jan 2011
Old 03-08-2012 , 16:27   Re: Why do CSS:DM still requires a extension?
Reply With Quote #5

Yeh, but why not so use default sourcepawn function for all execpt FFA?
Yeh sdkhooks is also a extension, but it not only used for 1 plugin.
It not a direct problem for me, but not "so much for install CSSM extension".
klausenbusk is offline
klausenbusk
AlliedModders Donor
Join Date: Jan 2011
Old 03-09-2012 , 17:38   Re: Why do CSS:DM still requires a extension?
Reply With Quote #6

Have created a public fork of CSS:DM, not because it a big problem it requires a extension, but yeh i cant see why and not want to use it when it required!
Some may think i stupid :D

Last edited by klausenbusk; 03-09-2012 at 17:47.
klausenbusk is offline
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Theme made by Freecode