[Version: 2.0] Notepad++ Classic Syntax Highlighting

ShufflexDD · **Author**

I've made another syntax highlighting for Notepad++ from scratch.
It looks almost like original NP++ highlighting.
As compared with another highlighting it hasn't bug with escaping symbols, and has all predefined constants & operators.

Installing:
Notepad++ -> Language -> Define your language... -> Import and restart Notepad++.

Version: 2.0

ChangeLog:
2.0
-- Added all predefined constants with Turquoise color(the same as in standard sourcepawn highlighting)
-- Added support separating big numbers with underscore: new z = 1_000_000
1.0 - 11 views

P.S: As you can see in preview, last number in color array isn't looks correctly. It will be fixed in new revisions of Notepad++.

ReFlexPoison · *Last edited by ReFlexPoison; 11-17-2012 at 00:40.*

Guess I'll give it a try, been using the most recent which sadly doesn't have the basic console include <_<

Edit: Will this had include definitions ever?

ShufflexDD · 11-17-2012 , 04:38 Re: Notepad++ Classic Syntax Highlighting

please tell me more about this

Zephyrus · 11-17-2012 , 07:26 Re: Notepad++ Classic Syntax Highlighting

i think he means that .inc is not added to the default file extensions

ShufflexDD · 11-17-2012 , 07:43 Re: Notepad++ Classic Syntax Highlighting

I didn't add it because all languages has .inc extension.
Tell me if I'm wrong, and I'll add it.

ReFlexPoison · 11-18-2012 , 17:08 Re: Notepad++ Classic Syntax Highlighting

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShufflexDD

I didn't add it because all languages has .inc extension.
Tell me if I'm wrong, and I'll add it.

ShufflexDD · 11-19-2012 , 08:50 Re: [Version: 2.0] Notepad++ Classic Syntax Highlighting

got it.
I'll try to do it.

ReFlexPoison · 11-19-2012 , 22:46 Re: [Version: 2.0] Notepad++ Classic Syntax Highlighting

Here's a version using the same highlighting as your version but with Auto-Completion for the core and custom includes. Used the generator from the other thread here.

ShufflexDD · *Last edited by ShufflexDD; 11-20-2012 at 09:41.*

oh, sh*t.......................
I almost finished doing it by myself in php

anyway, I'm trying to finish mine, cause that have only functions

ReFlexPoison · *Last edited by ReFlexPoison; 11-20-2012 at 16:57.*

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShufflexDD

oh, sh*t.......................
I almost finished doing it by myself in php

anyway, I'm trying to finish mine, cause that have only functions

The problem with the generator based Auto-Completions is it adds void to the signatures for a large portion of the natives in the includes. You can customize it to your liking by editing the xml file but there are over 900 entrees with this "problem."

Here is a version simply changing void to a > symbol.