Raised This Month: $12 Target: $400
 3% 

VSH Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!


Post New Thread Reply   
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Chdata
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Computer Chair, Illinois
Old 10-17-2015 , 18:52   Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Reply With Quote #561

Ah I see, it's acting like RTD is required because the usual .inc is missing all the things that make it "optional".
__________________
Chdata is offline
Chdata
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Computer Chair, Illinois
Old 10-18-2015 , 06:39   Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Reply With Quote #562

Want to apologize again for releasing it with such glaring bugs.

So far I've fixed the following:
rtd being required (ew lol)

https://github.com/Chdata/Versus-Sax...commits/master

Here's the latest version from github: https://github.com/Chdata/Versus-Sax...saxtonhale.smx

I may or may not make it as a full release/update for the bugfixes included, but if I do it'll be the same as the .smx linked above anyway.
__________________

Last edited by Chdata; 10-18-2015 at 07:13.
Chdata is offline
Powerlord
AlliedModders Donor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Seduce Me!
Old 10-19-2015 , 15:35   Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Reply With Quote #563

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chdata View Post
Ah I see, it's acting like RTD is required because the usual .inc is missing all the things that make it "optional".
Fun fact: SteamTools does the same thing.
__________________
Not currently working on SourceMod plugin development.
Powerlord is offline
Wliu
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Old 10-19-2015 , 16:15   Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Reply With Quote #564

Quote:
Originally Posted by Powerlord View Post
Fun fact: SteamTools does the same thing.
Welp, might as well make it required in that case -.-
__________________
~Wliu
Wliu is offline
Chdata
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Computer Chair, Illinois
Old 10-20-2015 , 08:43   Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Reply With Quote #565

Or fix that and make it optional...
__________________
Chdata is offline
nergal
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Old 10-25-2015 , 14:08   Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Reply With Quote #566

how about we finally switch saxtonhale to the new syntax and use it to clean up the code?

want me to fork it, fix it up, and do a pull request?
__________________

Last edited by nergal; 10-25-2015 at 14:08.
nergal is offline
Wliu
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Old 10-25-2015 , 14:45   Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Reply With Quote #567

Quote:
Originally Posted by nergal View Post
how about we finally switch saxtonhale to the new syntax and use it to clean up the code?

want me to fork it, fix it up, and do a pull request?
Wildcard did that. I don't think Chdata agreed, so now it's back to old-style.
__________________
~Wliu
Wliu is offline
Chdata
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Computer Chair, Illinois
Old 10-25-2015 , 15:20   Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Reply With Quote #568

Wildcard did do that, and I reverted it.

The code can still be made cleaner without changing to that syntax anyway.
__________________

Last edited by Chdata; 10-25-2015 at 15:20.
Chdata is offline
nergal
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Old 10-25-2015 , 15:30   Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Reply With Quote #569

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chdata View Post
Wildcard did do that, and I reverted it.

The code can still be made cleaner without changing to that syntax anyway.
I don't think you understand that you're going to eventually have to convert it to the new syntax anyways, you might as well convert it and save yourself from doing the work of converting it fully when the syntax is matured...

Not only that, I've somewhat mastered the methodmaps (unless their semantics change) and I very much feel that the VSH code can easily be cleaned up with methodmaps...
__________________
nergal is offline
Windle
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Lancashire
Old 10-25-2015 , 15:39   Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Reply With Quote #570

Quote:
Originally Posted by nergal View Post
I don't think you understand that you're going to eventually have to convert it to the new syntax anyways, you might as well convert it and save yourself from doing the work of converting it fully when the syntax is matured...

Not only that, I've somewhat mastered the methodmaps (unless their semantics change) and I very much feel that the VSH code can easily be cleaned up with methodmaps...
Peer pressure! Dun dun dunnnn.
Windle is offline
Send a message via MSN to Windle
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:15.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Theme made by Freecode