[Depresie]

Well maybe we should lower the standards a little bit when it comes to approving

@Craxor
That is the biggest lie i ever heard

[GinNNy]

I guess some of the old plugins from 2005+ are broken right now so maybe an old branch plugins section or something not sure..

[addons_zz]

Originally Posted by GinNNy I guess some of the old plugins from 2005+ are broken right now so maybe an old branch plugins section or something not sure..

Well, the unapproved subforum is called `Unapproved/Old Plugins`, so just last to take the old plugins and put they there. So, instead of a new `Approved Plugin`, why now split the `Unapproved/Old Plugins` into `Unapproved Plugins` and `Old Plugins`?

Initially, let everything currently on `Unapproved/Old Plugins` at `Unapproved Plugins`, and put the oldest plugins on`Approved Plugins` at the new `Old Plugins`.

[Depresie]

Agree with addons_zz

[fysiks]

Old does not mean that they are bad. If anything were to change, it should be like SourceMod does it. If it's broken or poorly written it can be report and reviewed (or reviewed directly by an approver or rather an unapprover).

Back when there were only two plugin forums (Approved and Unapproved) they thought it would help to have a third forum (Plugins in Review) but look at how well that helped. Not at all. It just made it more confusing (especially for people that don't frequent the forums but are looking for plugins).

Think of the SourceMod method as "innocent until proven guilty".

[Potato Uno]

But we didn't add a new forum like this poll is suggesting... we removed a forum!

[fysiks]

Originally Posted by Potato Uno But we didn't add a new forum like this poll is suggesting... we removed a forum!

"Plugins in Review" was added a few years ago. I can't remember exactly when but this is what I was referring to in my previous post.