[violentcrimes]

What is banned for KAC ID:6.6 mean?

[ZekeBob]

Originally Posted by violentcrimes What is banned for KAC ID:6.6 mean?

1 - Name copying 
2 - Name hack (unconnected fools) 
3 - Failure to validate in time. 
4.x - Failure to reply correctly to convar query. 
5.x - Failure to match server replicated convar. 
6.x - Failure to match plugins convar values list. 
 
The x is the number representing the convar they failed to match. In the Source code file you'll notice I added comments after the convar names. The numbers mean their order and what they would be shown on a ban (x). The last number is what your interested in. 
 
In a more expanded term on the 4-6 IDs here is some stuff you might want to know. 
 
4 is for when cheat-makers attempt to just block convar queries. This would be done by causing a reply like Convar_Invalid, etc. This should never happen on a legit client. 
5 is when the convar and the value provided by the client does not match the servers. This will pretty much just be replicated convars that should, on normal clients, always match the server's copy. Illegitimate clients (cheaters) will generally either reply with the convars default value or with the values modified beyond what they should be. (sv_cheats 1, sv_consistency 0, etc.) 
6 is for client convars that don't exist on the server and thus can't be compared. These generally are cheat convars that, on legit clients, cannot be changed from their default values. __________________ 
HackCVars 
     "cl_clock_correction", 0 
     "cl_leveloverview",1     
     "cl_overdraw_test",2     
     "cl_particles_show_bbox", 3 
     "cl_phys_timescale",4     
     "cl_showevents",    5 
     "fog_enable",6         
     "host_timescale",    7 
     "mat_fillrate",8     
     "mat_proxy",9         
     "mat_wireframe",10 
     "mem_force_flush",11     
     "snd_show",12         
     "snd_visualize",13 
     "sv_cheats",14         
     "sv_consistency",    15 
     "sv_gravity",16     
     "r_aspectratio",    17 
     "r_colorstaticprops",18     
     "r_DispWalkable",19     
     "r_DrawBeams",    20     
     "r_drawbrushmodels",21     
     "r_drawclipbrushes",22     
     "r_drawdecals",    23     
     "r_drawentities",    24 
     "r_drawopaqueworld",25 
     "r_drawothermodels",26 
     "r_drawparticles",27     
     "r_drawrenderboxes",28 
     "r_drawtranslucentworld", 29 
     "r_shadowwireframe",30     
     "r_skybox",31     
     "r_visocclusion",32 
     "vcollide_wireframe"33 
            "cl_bobcycle",34 
            "mat_dxlevel",35

[Kigen]

Originally Posted by doa Does KAC trigger on all commands? In this case the player had one bind resulting in 12 buys, on top of that he also had TAB binded to 'timeleft' to easily se the time left at the same tie ha looked at the current score. If he would press whatever button binded to the buy-sequense, and then immediatly press TAB to see the score and thereby fire of a timeleft command with the same second as the buys, would that result in a ban by KAC? And what does the number after timeleft mean? i.e. "...attempted to spam crash this server with: timeleft 152."

KAC is only concerned with the commands timeleft, nextmap, and endround. Using a buy bind won't cause a KAC ban, or contribute thereto.

[Faust_mateo]

Hello!

Running TF2 & SM 1.2

No-sockets from from page.

Getting this error, anyone know why?

L 07/18/2009 - 05:15:22: [SM] Displaying call stack trace for plugin "kigen-ac-pub-nosockets.smx":
L 07/18/2009 - 05:15:22: [SM]   [0]  Line 1383, kigen-ac-pub.sp::KillTimers()
L 07/18/2009 - 05:15:22: [SM]   [1]  Line 690, kigen-ac-pub.sp::OnClientDisconnect_Post()

[NouveauJoueur]

Originally Posted by Kigen I'm aware of it. It doesn't cause any issues besides the error logs.

[doa]

Originally Posted by Kigen KAC is only concerned with the commands timeleft, nextmap, and endround. Using a buy bind won't cause a KAC ban, or contribute thereto.

It looks like a lot of players have bounded TAB to timeleft for the convenience to see how long time it's left at the same time when checking the score. And my guess is that the command timeleft will be issued multiple times due to key-repeat. And therefore the player will be banned.


I think it's rather hard to give the player a permanent ban because of this, wouldn't it be enough to kick to culprit?

[m4ster]

say:

they are pressing TAB 10x times per second ? wow

[doa]

Originally Posted by m4ster say: they are pressing TAB 10x times per second ? wow

...will be issued multiple times due to key-repeat

[Kigen]

doa, I don't understand why someone would pound a button ten times in a single second. But ultimately it is up to you if you want to keep that person banned or unban them. There isn't anything I can provide for you anymore.

[ShambleS]

Originally Posted by Kigen doa, I don't understand why someone would pound a button ten times in a single second. But ultimately it is up to you if you want to keep that person banned or unban them. There isn't anything I can provide for you anymore.

just thought id mention Ive just tried..
And you cannot hit a button 10x a second...