[Napoleon_be]

for(new i = 0; i < inum; i++)

is this the only thing you changed? why would that make any difference since "i" is automaticly set to 0 while creating it?

Also, Black Rose was just pointing out how my testcode was working. It was working as intended but just coded wrong by me for it to work as it should work.

[CrazY.]

You do not see that I've changed bracket position? Take a look at my modification again.

[Napoleon_be]

Originally Posted by CrazY. You do not see that I've changed bracket position? Take a look at my modification again.

Well next time you should indent your code, wasn't obvious. I'll tell my mate to try it and keep you up to date. Didn't seem logical to me to loop all that code every single time.

[CrazY.]

Maybe next time you need to pay more attention. If you do not test, never you will know if the logic make sense.

[Napoleon_be]

Originally Posted by CrazY. Maybe next time you need to pay more attention. If you do not test, never you will know if the logic make sense.

It's not even my plugin. Brackets are the last thing people check, even if they check it. Poor of you to ignore the fact that you should just indent the code. nvm, help of you will be not needed anymore, ignorant prick.

[HamletEagle]

Originally Posted by Napoleon_be It's not even my plugin. Brackets are the last thing people check, even if they check it. Poor of you to ignore the fact that you should just indent the code. nvm, help of you will be not needed anymore, ignorant prick.

He's helping you and he is right. Why are you mad?
You have a for THAT DOES NOTHING. It is literally for() { id = players[i] }. What's the point in this?

[Napoleon_be]

Originally Posted by HamletEagle He's helping you and he is right. Why are you mad? You have a for THAT DOES NOTHING. It is literally for() { id = players[i] }. What's the point in this?

I'm not mad.

Yea my mistake