[Geesu]

It's weird this actually doesn't work

void CPlayer::set_user_defuser( bool bValue )
{
	int initialItem = *((int *)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM);
	int initialIcon = *((int *)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM_ICON);

	if( bValue )
	{
		*((int *)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM) &= (1<<0);
		*((int *)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM_ICON) &= (1<<0);
	}
	else
	{
		*((int *)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM) &= ~(1<<0);
		*((int *)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM_ICON) &= ~(1<<0);
	}
}

But it I change the &= to = then it works, but that is basically erasing other data that is in that offset

[BAILOPAN]

You can also do -= probably

[Fruchtzwerg]

Originally Posted by Pimp Daddy But it I change the &= to = then it works, but that is basically erasing other data that is in that offset

That is because you use int pointers, but the data isn't int. Use the correct data size and it will not change other parameters.

[Geesu]

Originally Posted by Fruchtzwerg Originally Posted by Pimp Daddy But it I change the &= to = then it works, but that is basically erasing other data that is in that offset That is because you use int pointers, but the data isn't int. Use the correct data size and it will not change other parameters.

How do I determine the correct data size?

this also worked after initial testing:

void CPlayer::set_user_defuser( bool bValue )
{

	if( bValue )
	{
		*((int *)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM) |= (1<<0);
		*((int *)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM_ICON) |= (1<<0);
	}
	else
	{
		*((int *)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM) -= (1<<0);
		*((int *)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM_ICON) -= (1<<0);
	}
}

[vancelorgin]

void CPlayer::set_user_defuser(bool bValue){ 
   if(bValue){ 
      *((unsigned long*)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM) |= (1<<0); 
      *((unsigned long*)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM_ICON) |= (1<<0); 
   }else{ 
      *((unsigned long*)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM) &= ~(1<<0); 
      *((unsigned long*)pEnt->GetUnknown() + OFFSET_ITEM_ICON) &= ~(1<<0); 
   } 
}

Use that. Most things are DWORD's =/

(8 bits here because I'm lazy - 8 for BYTE / char, 16 for WORD, 32 for DWORD / int, 64 for QWORD / double)

value<<x shifts value left x times, so
(1<<0) = 00000001
(1<<5) = 00100000

NEG (~) returns the inverse of a value:
~00000001 = 11111110
~01010101 = 10101010

AND (&) results in a value who's bits are only on in both - it, combined with negation, can turn off a bit or bits:
00000001 & 11111110 = 00000000
00101001 & 11111110 = 00101000

OR (|) results in a value who's bits are on in either - it can turn on a bit or bits:
00000001 | 10000000 = 10000001
01010101 | 10101010 = 11111111

XOR (^) results in a value who's bits are only different in both - it, in practice, toggles a bit or bits:
00001001 ^ 00000001 = 00001000
00001000 ^ 00000001 = 00001001

The problem with -= is that it carries over to other bits.

[Geesu]

sweet thanks vancel

Here are some more nice things Player origin vector and velocity vector (floats):


#define OFFSET_ORIGIN_X 812 // Player Origin in X Axis
#define OFFSET_ORIGIN_Y 813 // Player Origin in Y Axis
#define OFFSET_ORIGIN_Z 814 // Player Origin in Z Axis
#define OFFSET_VELOCITY_X 648
#define OFFSET_VELOCITY_Y 649
#define OFFSET_VELOCITY_Z 650

[vancelorgin]

You may as well just use CBaseEntity dude - you're reversing it when you've already got it defined for you like 2 folders away Everything down to at least rendercolor hasn't changed for CS:S or HL2DM - CBasePlayer works in HL2DM as well - haven't tried in CS:S. I'm also using some of the AI classes for.. uhh.. summoned things (remote control npc_strider, anyone?)

[Geesu]

Are you talking about using CBasePlayer by pointing to the offset in memory?

[theqizmo]

No, he means use it something like this, this isn't a real life example, just showing you how you would use it;

PLUGIN_RESULT CPlugin::ClientCommand( edict_t *pEntity )
{
	CBaseEntity *pCBaseEntity = NULL;
	pCBaseEntity = pEntity->GetUnknown()->GetBaseEntity();

	if (pCBaseEntity)
	{
		int iCurrHealth = pCBaseEntity->GetHealth();
		pCBaseEntity->SetHealth(iCurrHealth - 5);
	}
	else
	{
		// Wasn't able to find the pointer
		return PLUGIN_CONTINUE;		
	}
}

[Geesu]

Originally Posted by theqizmo No, he means use it something like this, this isn't a real life example, just showing you how you would use it; PLUGIN_RESULT CPlugin::ClientCommand( edict_t *pEntity ) { CBaseEntity *pCBaseEntity = NULL; pCBaseEntity = pEntity->GetUnknown()->GetBaseEntity(); if (pCBaseEntity) { int iCurrHealth = pCBaseEntity->GetHealth(); pCBaseEntity->SetHealth(iCurrHealth - 5); } else { // Wasn't able to find the pointer return PLUGIN_CONTINUE; } }

thats possible? To find the pointer to a class like that?