[dany123]

Hey guys

I am about to purchase a mouse and it has software with it that suppresses recoil and burst fires,

Reading the forums has got me nowhere because I see "yes it vac bans" and "no it doesn't"


Here is a link to more detail about it

http://www.bloody.tw/en/ultra%20core3.asp

Will it vac ban or not?

[DruGzOG]

Well its manipulating game play using some sort of script and software, so I wouldn't be surprised if you will be vac banned

[Backstabnoob]

It won't VAC ban you.

[dany123]

Yeah this is what I was getting on the steam forums lol I don't what to do.

Yes reasons, were it changes your game play and goes into the settings..

NO reasons were it's a mouse software and vac doesn't detect it, most you will get is a server ban by server administrators

[joshknifer]

Just get better at CS. Then you don't need a new mouse or have to worry about a VAC ban.

[Powerlord]

Originally Posted by Backstabnoob It won't VAC ban you.

Even if that's true, it likely needs a qualifying "yet" in there.

[Fr33m@n]

basically, doing a script is easy and will never get you VAC banned.

I'm sure you can do a ball per ball script combining wait and +attack -attack.

[ANTICHRISTUS]

"to VAC or not to VAC, that is the question".

so such mouses really exist, a friend told me about them without knowing any "real" details. regarding the VAC stupidity, I think you'll catch it . but if you are a clean player, so why to buy this shit ?!?

Originally Posted by Fr33m@n basically, doing a script is easy and will never get you VAC banned.

are you promoting cheats ? shame on you !!

Originally Posted by Powerlord Even if that's true, it likely needs a qualifying "yet" in there.

as long as the stupid pair is ruling CS, nothing will happen.

[Powerlord]

Originally Posted by ANTICHRISTUS as long as the stupid pair is ruling CS, nothing will happen.

I was including VAC2 in that, which is used by Source games... although CS:GO may be using VAC3 by now, not sure.

[Backstabnoob]

Originally Posted by Powerlord Even if that's true, it likely needs a qualifying "yet" in there.

You probably don't know how VAC works. The software only changes the mouse pointer on the fly, which has absolutely zero impact on what VAC detects. VAC scans for known hack patterns in the memory.