[Onedda]

Thanks Asherkin & Damizean for this, when will the item generator web site be up and running properly?

[noodleboy347]

Please correct my stupidity, but what is the Sourcepawn interface for?

[asherkin]

It's so that SourceMod plug-ins can be written that can manage items. It's pretty undocumented at the moment, but most coders can probably work it out from what little there is right now.

[Citrixlemon]

Been testing this and it runs great, many thanks! I was wondering if there would be a way to have an option to apply the attributes to the entire server via a cvar? I know you can just do CTX edits, but this extension lets you modify them on the fly, so I'd like to be able to make the changes global.

[asherkin]

That's the purpose of the wild card block, read the first post and the previous page for more info.

[Pawn 3-pg]

I've found a bug with the SM interface.

This works:
new Handle:hTest = TF2Items_CreateItem(OVERRIDE_ITEM_QUALITY)

This doesn't:
new Handle:hTest = TF2Items_CreateItem(OVERRIDE_ATTRIBUTES + OVERRIDE_ITEM_QUALITY)

At least, in the second example the item quality is never changed. The attributes are applied, but the quality stays the same.

[asherkin]

They are flags, like on CVars, it should be:

new Handle:hTest = TF2Items_CreateItem(OVERRIDE_ATTRIBUTES|OVERRIDE_ITEM_QUALITY)

[Pawn 3-pg]

Originally Posted by asherkin They are flags, like on CVars, it should be: new Handle:hTest = TF2Items_CreateItem(OVERRIDE_ATTRIBUTES|OVERRIDE_ITEM_QUALITY)

When dealing with flags, + and | do the same thing.

You can ignore my bug report though. I reinstalled SM and the problem went away.

[bl4nk]

Originally Posted by Pawn 3-pg When dealing with flags, + and | do the same thing. You can ignore my bug report though. I reinstalled SM and the problem went away.

This is correct, but the common usage is using the | operator. There is no real difference, but it's just how everyone handles it.

Does anyone have the issue where it crashes your server if you try to reload the extension?