[_Mazare]

is there any way to prevent bots taking over tank players when frustration reaches 0 and
reset tank frustration to 100 when tank frustration reaches 0.

any ideas?

[TotalChaos SourcePawner]

There are ConVars for this.
The "master" would be z_frustration, and z_frustration_* controls everything else.
"*" being the rest of the ConVars.

They're all marked as cheats, though.
So you'll have to use this: "sm_cvar z_frustration 0".

[_Mazare]

it just deactivates the frustration tank.

what I actually want is to reset tanks frustrated to 100 when the frustrated tanks reach 0 and prevent bots from replace tank player.

[_Mazare]

Sorry for the previous message. If I didn't communicate it clearly, I have edited it.

[TotalChaos SourcePawner]

Why would you want to reset it to 100?
By turning it off, Tank bots never replace Tank players.

I don't know of any way to reset it to 100 after it hits zero.
But through editing some ConVar values, you could probably make it go down a bit slower,
almost as if it was at 200 or 300 instead.
I don't usually mess with those ConVars, though.
So I don't know what exact combination you would need to do that.

[HarryPotter]

Use L4D_OnTryOfferingTankBot from left4dhooks

PHP Code:

public Action L4D_OnTryOfferingTankBot(int tank_index, bool &enterStasis)
{
    if (tank_index && IsClientInGame(tank_index) && !IsFakeClient(tank_index))
    {
        PrintToChatAll("%N tank player gets full frustration", tank_index);
        SetEntProp(tank_index, Prop_Send, "m_frustration", 0);
        return Plugin_Handled;
    }

    return Plugin_Continue;
} 


[TotalChaos SourcePawner]

Originally Posted by HarryPotter Use L4D_OnTryOfferingTankBot from left4dhooks PHP Code: public Action L4D_OnTryOfferingTankBot(int tank_index, bool &enterStasis) {     if (tank_index && IsClientInGame(tank_index) && !IsFakeClient(tank_index))     {         PrintToChatAll("%N tank player gets full frustration", tank_index);         SetEntProp(tank_index, Prop_Send, "m_frustration", 0);         return Plugin_Handled;     }     return Plugin_Continue; }

Kinda off-topic, but wouldn't that redefine it? Causing errors if you include "left4dhooks" or "left4dhooks_stocks"?
I tried something similar one time, and the compiler just told me that I was redefining it, and threw an error.
EDIT: Nevermind. It's working for me now. No idea what I was doing wrong with my code, because now it just works and I barely changed anything.

[HarryPotter]

Originally Posted by TotalChaos SourcePawner Kinda off-topic, but wouldn't that redefine it? Causing errors if you include "left4dhooks" or "left4dhooks_stocks"?

LOL, you first time write the SourcePawn program?

[TotalChaos SourcePawner]

Originally Posted by HarryPotter LOL, you first time write the SourcePawn program?

I'm not very good with any coding language, and SourcePawn is especially a challenge for me sometimes.
I don't have experience with most "normal" coding languages (Java/JavaScript, C, C#, etc.). As in, I never coded with them before (though, most languages are pretty similar).
I learned most of what I know now through GLua, a mixture of C++ and Lua.

Spoiler

I can put together nearly anything with GLua, but finding all the pieces to put it together is the real challenge. In fact, I had to cancel some of the stuff I was working on because I couldn't find everything I needed to make it work.