[fatal_nl]

PHP Code:

new bool:g_bAdmin[33]

public client_authorized(id)
{
    g_bAdmin[id] = bool:(get_user_flags(id) & ADMIN_LEVEL_G)
}

public some_function(id)
{
    client_print(0, print_chat, "%i", g_bAdmin[id])
} 


This wil give 262144 in chat. I thought booleans are supposed to give either true (1) or false (0).

[ddhoward]

You're just retagging; you're not actually changing the value.

PHP Code:

new bool:g_bAdmin[33] 

public client_authorized(id) 
{ 
    g_bAdmin[id] = !!(get_user_flags(id) & ADMIN_LEVEL_G) 
} 

public some_function(id) 
{ 
    client_print(0, print_chat, "%i", g_bAdmin[id]) 
} 


Try this. This is how we'd do it in Sourcemod, so it should be the same here.

[klippy]

Operator & doesn't return a boolean value.

[ddhoward]

Originally Posted by KliPPy Operator & doesn't return a boolean value.

He tagged it as bool. He seems to have been under the impression that retagging actually changed the value within the cell.

[Natsheh]

g_bAdmin[id] = boolget_user_flags(id) & ADMIN_LEVEL_G) ? true:false;

As klippy said operator & is not a comparison operator.

[ddhoward]

Originally Posted by Natsheh g_bAdmin[id] = bool:(get_user_flags(id) & ADMIN_LEVEL_G) ? true:false; As klippy said operator & is not a comparison operator.

Does !! not work in AMX Mod X? Also, why are you tagging as bool something that is already bool? If your ternary operator is already returning true or false... the tag isn't necessary?

PHP Code:

g_bAdmin[id] = !!(get_user_flags(id) & ADMIN_LEVEL_G); 


Is this not valid in Amx?

[Black Rose]

Originally Posted by ddhoward Does !! not work in AMX Mod X? Also, why are you tagging as bool something that is already bool? If your ternary operator is already returning true or false... the tag isn't necessary? PHP Code: g_bAdmin[id] = !!(get_user_flags(id) & ADMIN_LEVEL_G);  Is this not valid in Amx?

It works.

Originally Posted by fatal_nl PHP Code: // ...  This wil give 262144 in chat. I thought booleans are supposed to give either true (1) or false (0).

EVERYTHING in this language is a 32-bit cell or an array of it. Integers, booleans, floats, strings and pointers, it's just all the same. Tags are there so the compiler can point out possible mistakes.

[klippy]

Originally Posted by ddhoward He tagged it as bool. He seems to have been under the impression that retagging actually changed the value within the cell.

Yeah, I just pointed out why OP's code didn't work as they expected it to. Your solution works.