[WildCard65]

Closed source binaries aren't any more secure then open source binaries are.

Originally Posted by Steam chat with git user bartico6 WildCard65 the Joker Card: In your opinion WildCard65 the Joker Card: do you think closed source binaries are more secure then open source WildCard65 the Joker Card: in my opinion, that's not true quake: no quake: with enough effort they can be decompiled and audited too quake: and then, the amount of people knowing about the vulnerability is a lot smaller quake: yes, less people will abuse it, but the abuse will go on for much longer quake: with opensource, someone will find it and use it, sure, they'll even make it public, (or not, someone will find it too at some point), and it will be eventually fixed quake: people are willing to contribute to something they use, and they want to be secure WildCard65 the Joker Card: but with closed source, it's a lot harder to trace where it's happening in the code quake: thinking closed source is safer than open source is just absurd quake: and we're skipping backdoors/malicious code quake: because that's a WHOLE different story quake: of trust and shit WildCard65 the Joker Card: tell me about it...