Quote:
Originally Posted by HamletEagle
1. I did review it and reached the conclusion the other plugin is objectively better and with more features. No point in doing a code review on a duplicate/bad idea. You are free to update your plugin, add more features, make it better than other plugins and request another review. Being salty about it isn't going to change anything.
2. About it taking 4 years: it takes however long it takes. Moderators/approvers do whatever they can do in whatever free time they have, we are not paid to do anything. We do it voluntarily so it's quite hypocritical of you to expect a free service and then complain it wasn't performed in the way you wanted it to be performed.
3. Just because 4 years passed that means it shouldn't ever be checked?
4. If you look at it objectively, the community "died" because there is less and less interest in cs 1.6 which is perfectly normal for such an old game.
|
the other plugin was released 2 years after mine. if mine was reviewed on time, it would have been approved, or it would have been improved and then approved. in such case, the new plugin would have been a copy of already existing plugin and be unapproved, but now it's the other way around. because of your laziness this thing has been written twice... but whatever
also, he stole my idea without even giving me credits
real cool
thats the only thing im mad about
lastly, the game didnt die, the community died... all servers are basically the same... there are no new plugins released, there is nothing new to experience. that's developers' fault.