Quote:
Originally Posted by GoD-Tony
I thought I'd ask here because I'm considering doing the same: Is it better to have a separate repository just for Updater releases, or to have named branches on the main one?
For example, code is always pushed to default, but Updater releases could be pushed to a "stable-release" branch, then maybe have a "dev-release" as well.
Is it down to personal preference or would one be more recommended than the other?
|
Since it's transparent to the end user, use whatever is easiest for you.