Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Ah I see, it's acting like RTD is required because the usual .inc is missing all the things that make it "optional".
|
Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Want to apologize again for releasing it with such glaring bugs.
So far I've fixed the following: rtd being required (ew lol) https://github.com/Chdata/Versus-Sax...commits/master Here's the latest version from github: https://github.com/Chdata/Versus-Sax...saxtonhale.smx I may or may not make it as a full release/update for the bugfixes included, but if I do it'll be the same as the .smx linked above anyway. |
Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Quote:
|
Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Quote:
|
Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Or fix that and make it optional...
|
Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
how about we finally switch saxtonhale to the new syntax and use it to clean up the code?
want me to fork it, fix it up, and do a pull request? |
Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Quote:
|
Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Wildcard did do that, and I reverted it.
The code can still be made cleaner without changing to that syntax anyway. |
Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Quote:
Not only that, I've somewhat mastered the methodmaps (unless their semantics change) and I very much feel that the VSH code can easily be cleaned up with methodmaps... |
Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:22. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.