AlliedModders

AlliedModders (https://forums.alliedmods.net/index.php)
-   VSH / Freak Fortress (https://forums.alliedmods.net/forumdisplay.php?f=154)
-   -   VSH Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models! (https://forums.alliedmods.net/showthread.php?t=244209)

Chdata 10-17-2015 18:52

Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
 
Ah I see, it's acting like RTD is required because the usual .inc is missing all the things that make it "optional".

Chdata 10-18-2015 06:39

Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
 
Want to apologize again for releasing it with such glaring bugs.

So far I've fixed the following:
rtd being required (ew lol)

https://github.com/Chdata/Versus-Sax...commits/master

Here's the latest version from github: https://github.com/Chdata/Versus-Sax...saxtonhale.smx

I may or may not make it as a full release/update for the bugfixes included, but if I do it'll be the same as the .smx linked above anyway.

Powerlord 10-19-2015 15:35

Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chdata (Post 2354105)
Ah I see, it's acting like RTD is required because the usual .inc is missing all the things that make it "optional".

Fun fact: SteamTools does the same thing.

Wliu 10-19-2015 16:15

Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Powerlord (Post 2354806)
Fun fact: SteamTools does the same thing.

Welp, might as well make it required in that case -.-

Chdata 10-20-2015 08:43

Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
 
Or fix that and make it optional...

nergal 10-25-2015 14:08

Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
 
how about we finally switch saxtonhale to the new syntax and use it to clean up the code?

want me to fork it, fix it up, and do a pull request?

Wliu 10-25-2015 14:45

Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nergal (Post 2356515)
how about we finally switch saxtonhale to the new syntax and use it to clean up the code?

want me to fork it, fix it up, and do a pull request?

Wildcard did that. I don't think Chdata agreed, so now it's back to old-style.

Chdata 10-25-2015 15:20

Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
 
Wildcard did do that, and I reverted it.

The code can still be made cleaner without changing to that syntax anyway.

nergal 10-25-2015 15:30

Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chdata (Post 2356535)
Wildcard did do that, and I reverted it.

The code can still be made cleaner without changing to that syntax anyway.

I don't think you understand that you're going to eventually have to convert it to the new syntax anyways, you might as well convert it and save yourself from doing the work of converting it fully when the syntax is matured...

Not only that, I've somewhat mastered the methodmaps (unless their semantics change) and I very much feel that the VSH code can easily be cleaned up with methodmaps...

Windle 10-25-2015 15:39

Re: Versus Saxton Hale 1.55 - New Saxton Hale + Vagineer Models!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nergal (Post 2356540)
I don't think you understand that you're going to eventually have to convert it to the new syntax anyways, you might as well convert it and save yourself from doing the work of converting it fully when the syntax is matured...

Not only that, I've somewhat mastered the methodmaps (unless their semantics change) and I very much feel that the VSH code can easily be cleaned up with methodmaps...

Peer pressure! Dun dun dunnnn.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:22.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.